Archives: Articles

IssueM Articles

RMB seen as third reserve currency, after dollar and euro

The growth of an international market for trading Chinese currency and renminbi-denominated bonds will help institutional investors that need alternatives to the U.S. dollar and the euro, according to executives at US-based Principal Global Investors, a unit of the Principal Financial Group.

“The world needs multiple reserve currencies to allow diversification,” Jim McCaughan, Principal’s CEO, told Investments & Pensions Asia. “For investors who have global aggregate portfolios or diversified global bond portfolios, having the RMB as an extra source of diversification is really important.”  

Sovereign reserve funds in particular regard the RMB, which first became available as an investment currency in July 2010, as a potential alternative reserve currency, McCaughan said.

In 2011, the Chinese government introduced a yield curve by issuing two-, three-, five-, seven- and 10-year bonds, with China Development Bank in early January selling the first 15-year offshore yuan bond. The bank, China’s biggest bond issuer after the Ministry of Finance, priced the bonds to yield 4.2%.

Asian reserve funds have been holding 20%-30% of their funds in euros to hedge the dollar. But they regard the euro as overvalued, despite the impact of the European debt crisis. Increasingly, they see the yuan is seen as source of diversification and potential growth.

When the RMB first became available to investors, it attracted a rush of money. Indeed, the high demand pushed yields downward. In 2011, the currency appreciated only 4.8%, which reduced demand and helped restore the balance between the yield curves of onshore and offshore yuan bonds. 

Meanwhile, Hong Kong announced plans to help London become an offshore trading center for the yuan. The two financial centers will collaborate on clearing and settlement systems, market liquidity and development of new RMB-denominated products.

The RMB could help satisfy a demand for specialty high-yield bond investments among Asian pension funds, said Andrea Muller, Principal’s chief executive for Asia. The region’s institutional investors want to diversify away from domestic fixed income “and into emerging market debt and equities across the region,” she said.

“There has also been growing interest in commercial real estate, in particular from government pension funds across the region,” she added. “We’ve seen an increased demand for niche products such as mortgage-backed securities, REITS and high-yield debt.” They are also buying property in Japan, Australia, Europe and the U.S., she said.

January rally led by institutional investors: TrimTabs

“Giddy” institutional investors, many of whom believe the Fed could announce another round of money printing as early as this month, are driving the January rally, according to TrimTabs.

Much of the year-to-date gain in U.S. stocks has occurred in overnight futures trading—a sign that demand is coming from institutions, said Trim Tabs executive vice president David Santschi. “It’s not the retail crowd that’s pumping up stock futures,” he said

Retail investors remain pessimistic, judging by fund flows. TrimTabs estimates that U.S. equity funds have received only $3.3 billion in fresh cash so far in January, which historically see strong inflows.

For all of 2011, $932 billion flowed into checking and savings accounts—almost eight times the $117 billion that TrimTabs estimates flowed into stock and bond mutual funds and exchange-traded funds during the year.

TrimTabs sees a political factor at work. “The Fed will be pulling out all the stops to ensure President Obama’s re-election,” said Santschi. “If the Fed doesn’t hint at or announce plans to print more money, equity investors could be badly disappointed.”

Other possible signs that institutions are bullish: 

  • Short interest at New York Stock Exchange member firms fell 10.5% in December to the second-lowest level in the past two years.
  • The put/call ratio averaged only 0.81 on the past five trading days, the lowest five-day average since July 2011.
  • The VIX fell to 20.5 on January 12, its lowest level since July 2011.
  • 42% of the hedge funds surveyed by TrimTabs and BarclayHedge in December bullish on the S&P 500, while 30% were bearish. It was the highest level of optimism since last July.
  • 51.1% of newsletter writers are bullish, according to Investors Intelligence. That was the highest level of optimism since the market peak of April 2011.  
  • Bank of America’s survey of global fund managers found that asset allocators are more bullish on U.S. stocks than at any time since April 2010.

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.

Pacific Life launches GLWB for indexed annuity and ‘O-share’ variable annuity for Edward Jones

Pacific Life’s Pacific Index Choice, a fixed indexed annuity, has added an optional eight percent (simple interest), 10-year deferral bonus called Enhanced Lifetime Income Benefit, Pacific Life said in a release. 

Someone who purchased a $100,000 Pacific Index Choice contract with Enhanced Lifetime Income Benefit and waited10 years before making withdrawals, would have a benefit base of $180,000.

Under the lifetime income benefit, a single-life version of the rider pays out 5% from ages 59½ to 69; 6% from ages 70 to 79, and 7% from age 80 onward. (For joint-and-survivor contracts, the payout rates are a half-percent less in each age band.) The annual charge for the Enhanced Lifetime Income Benefit is 0.75%.

“Even if the annuity contract earns no interest, clients can boost the base amount from which they draw income by eight percent per year, for up to 10 years, simply by deferring the date they start their withdrawals,” said Christine Tucker, Pacific Life’s vice president of marketing, Retirement Solutions Division.

There are six-, eight- and ten-year surrender-period versions of the contract, and two crediting methods, a one-year point-to-point and a two-year point-to-point. The account can link to the performance of the S&P 500 Index or the MSCI All Country World Index. There’s also a “declared interest index option,” where a “fixed interest rate is credited if the index shows an increase” as well as a fixed return option, which promises a fixed interest rate of at least one percent.

On January 9, Pacific Life’s Retirement Solutions Division launched a new O-share variable annuity, Pacific Destinations O-Series, with the low mortality, expense, and administrative fees of an A-share product without an up-front sales charge. It has a seven-year surrender period. A premium-based charge will apply to each purchase payment and is deducted quarterly over a seven-year period.

Several insurers have created so-called O-share variable annuities to meet the demands of Edward Jones for a product with more customer-friendly pricing. Pacific Life’s product line for Edward Jones now includes fixed and variable annuities (including A-share and O-share versions of Pacific Destinations), mutual funds, and life insurance products.

 “The introduction of Pacific Destinations O-Series is another important step in fulfilling our commitment to provide Edward Jones Financial Advisors with a wide range of quality product choices to help meet clients’ needs and preferences,” said Chris van Mierlo, Pacific Life’s chief marketing officer, Retirement Solutions Division.

The Pacific Destinations O-Series product offers four investment asset allocation categories. For an additional cost, it also offers a choice of two optional guaranteed withdrawal benefits: Automatic Income Builder, which enables clients to receive income for life with automatic increases, and CoreIncome Advantage5 Plus, which enables clients to lock in market gains and an income that can continue for life.

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.

What’s in an advisor’s title? Still not much, says Cerulli

Just as 90% of all Frenchmen consider themselves to be above-average lovers, about twice as many advisors who call themselves “planners” offer planning services.

Registered reps who call themselves financial planners often merely recommend investments for accumulation, according to Cerulli Associates. The research firm suggested that the titles that brokerage employees use don’t necessarily reflect their skills.

“Without industry-wide consistency in the nomenclature used by advisors, lack of clarity about what services an advisor actually offers investors is likely to continue,” said Cerulli’s seventh Quantitative Update: Advisor Metrics, an annual sourcebook for data and analysis on advisors’ practices.

Although more than half (59%) of advisors perceive themselves as providing a level of service that merits the title of “financial planner,” Cerulli’s research showed, 56% are better categorized as “investment planners.” Only about 30% offer planning services.

In a survey, Cerulli asked advisors to classify their practices based on their perception of the services they offer. Cerulli then reviewed the actual services they offered (data also garnered through surveys) and the client base of each advisor to see which classification matched the advisor’s actual practice.

Many advisor practices “offer some of the basic elements of financial planning, but focus their efforts nearly exclusively on asset accumulation strategies,” Cerulli said in a release.

“Firms have encouraged their advisors to expand their advice relationships with clients, [but] advisors tend to overestimate the degree to which they are involved in the planning process.

“The movement to extend advice services is likely being accelerated by turbulent markets, as advisors who base their value to investors on investment performance have suffered more than those with broad advice relationships,” the release said. 

Yet most investors don’t need comprehensive planning, Cerulli pointed out. Clients with $500K to $2 million dollars in investable assets represent the largest pool of retail assets, but have relatively straightforward service requirements. Relatively few retail clients need estate, charitable, business planning, or private banking services.

The Bucket

Milliman opens office in Dusseldorf

Milliman Inc., the global consulting and actuarial firm, has opened a new office in Dusseldorf, Germany, to complement its existing office in Munich, according to a news release.

The Dusseldorf office is headed by Michael Leitschkis, who combines a consultancy background with experience as head of Modelling Life and Health at a major German insurance group. He is a member of the German Actuarial Union (DAV) and a lecturer of the German Actuarial Academy (DAA) as well as the European Actuarial Academy (EAA), lecturing on risk modelling within the CERA education framework.

The consultants in the new office will operate as part of the European Milliman team, which includes 250 consultants. Their main services will focus on risk modelling and ERM (Enterprise Risk Management), implementation of Solvency II and ALM (Asset Liability Management).

The new address is Milliman GmbH, Speditionstrasse 21, 40221 Dusseldorf. Tel. +49-211-88231-595; Fax. +49-211-88231-520.

Few GenXers on track for secure retirement: IRI

Only one-third of GenXers are at least very confident of having enough money to live comfortably during retirement, cover their medical expenses, and pay for their children’s higher education, according to “Retirement Readiness of Generation X,” a new report from the Insured Retirement Institute.

The research was conducted by means of telephone interviews with 802 adult Americans ages 30-49. The survey was conducted by Woelfel Research, Inc.

Just 41% of GenXers have tried to figure out how much money they will ultimately need to save, the survey showed. Among those who have saved, half have amassed less than $100,000.

Of those who pinpointed an anticipated retirement age, the average age was 64, indicating an average retirement period of more than 20 years.

Amid the recession, 15% of GenXers have made early withdrawals from their 401(k) plans, 23% stopped contributing to their retirement accounts, and 22% stopped contributing to college savings plans. Approximately 21% of older GenXers and younger Boomers in this group needed to dip into their retirement savings plans in the past year.

Single GenXers, women and those on the cusp of the Boomer Generation are in particular need of guidance in planning for retirement. 54% of female GenXers rated themselves as having little to no investment knowledge; this compares to 37% of male GenXers.

Only 24% of single GenXers were at least very confident that they would have enough savings to fund their lifetime retirement needs, compared to 40% of married GenXers.

On the other end of the scale, 35% of single GenXers expressed little to no confidence about having enough money for their retirement, compared to 20% of married GenXers.

Presently, 37% of GenXers have consulted a financial advisor. Among single GenXers, this figure is 20%. IRI defines Generation X as Americans born from 1965 through 1981, inclusive.

Generation X, as a group, is educated (one third have at least a Bachelor’s degree), own their own homes (at least 70% of married couples), and work in professional occupations (more than 40%).

FPA and AFCPE to leverage ‘synergistic strengths’ 

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association for Financial Counseling and Planning Education (AFCPE) will collaborate on “a number of initiatives designed to leverage the organizations’ natural synergistic strengths and resources,” the two organizations announced.

The FPA is the nation’s largest membership group for personal financial planning experts and AFCPE is dedicated to educating, training and certifying financial counselors and educators. The primary areas of collaboration will include:

  • Supporting and developing the complementary disciplines and professional specialties of financial counseling and financial planning.

  • Providing specially designed options to FPA members who wish to obtain Accredited Financial Counselors (AFC) and Certified Housing Counselors (CHC) certification, and to AFCPE counselors who are seeking membership within FPA and explore opportunities to work with Certified Financial Planner members of FPA

  • Helping enhance personal finance research and education programming, including expanded opportunities for FPA members and AFCPE certified counselors to gain Continuing Education
  • Developing communities of practice between FPA and AFCPE memberships both nationally and regionally  
  • Expanding educational sessions on key personal finance topics at the organizations’ respective conferences.

Fidelity’s global investing platform adds five countries and currencies

Fidelity Investments said it will add five additional countries and currencies to its online international investing platform, enabling investors to trade international stocks and exchange foreign currencies in 17 major markets.

All of Fidelity’s retail brokerage customers can now register online to trade directly in international markets. Previously, only Fidelity’s active traders and high-net-worth investors could do so.

The new countries and currencies available to Fidelity’s retail investors are:

  • Mexico; Peso (MXN)
  • New Zealand; New Zealand Dollar (NZD)
  • Singapore; Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • Sweden; Krona (SEK)
  • Switzerland; Swiss Franc (CHF)

Fidelity’s online international investing platform was launched in 2009.  In addition to direct access to 17 foreign markets and 13 currencies, Fidelity customers also can benefit from the more than 1,400 mutual funds and 250 ETFs with international securities exposure available on Fidelity.com/InternationalTrading. From 2010 to 2011, the number of international equity executions on Fidelity.com increased 89%.

Before the expansion, 12 countries were available on Fidelity’s brokerage platform: Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and the United Kingdom, with trading in eight currencies, the Australian Dollar, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Euro, Hong Kong Dollar, Japanese Yen, Norwegian Krone and U.S. Dollar.

Swiss Re names Group CEP

Swiss Re’s board of directors has appointed Michel M. Liès, a veteran Swiss Re executive, as the new Group Chief Executive Officer, effective February 1, 2012. He succeeds Stefan Lippe, who announced his departure last December.

Born in France, Liès is a citizen of Luxembourg. After obtaining a mathematics degree from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, he became chief financial officer of a ceramics company in Brazil. He joined Swiss Re in 1978, focusing on the Latin American Life & Health markets. In 1994 he was named head of Swiss Re Iberia & Latin America Property & Casualty and starting in 1998 he served as a member of the Executive Board and head of the Latin American Division.

From 2000 through 2005, Liès led Swiss Re’s Europe Division, after which he became global head of Client Markets and a member of the Executive Committee. In 2010, he was named chairman of Global Partnerships.

The Board also announced that Moses Ojeisekhoba will join Swiss Re as CEO Reinsurance Asia. The chairman of the Swiss Re board is Walter B. Kielholz. 

Putnam names two to global consultant relations team

Charlotte Walsh and Greg Weissman have joined the Global Institutional Management Consultant Relations team at Putnam Investments. The two will be based in Chicago and Boston, respectively.

Along with current team members Keith Thomas in London, Anne Lundberg in Chicago, and two Boston-based associates, they will report to Joseph Phoenix, head of Putnam Global Institutional Management. The new team will serve the needs of institutional asset management consultants worldwide.

Walsh joins Putnam from Ranieri Partners, where she was managing director, focusing on direct sales and consultant relations. A CFA charter holder, she also worked at Allegiant Asset Management, Oppenheimer Capital, and Banc One Investment Advisors/JP Morgan Asset Management, as Stratford Advisory Group and William M. Mercer Investment Consulting.  She attended Northwestern University.

Gregory Weissman was most recently senior vice president, director of consultant relations, Old Mutual Asset Management. Prior to that, he was director, institutional sales for Cowen & Company. Weissman has also held senior roles at Pacific Crest Securities and Jefferies & Company. He is a graduate of Southern Methodist University,
Edwin Cox School for Business.

DTCC releases report on 2011 and December annuity product activity

The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) Insurance & Retirement Services (I&RS) has released full-year and December information on activity in the market for annuity products from its Analytic Reporting for Annuities online information service, which leverages data from the transactions that DTCC processes for the industry. Analytic Reporting for Annuities is a service offering of National Securities Clearing Corporation, a DTCC subsidiary.

  • Inflows processed by DTCC in 2011 totaled over $90 billion.
  • DTCC processed nearly 45 million transactions categorized as inflows and out flows in 2011.
  • Net flows in 2011 totaled almost $24 billion.
  • Inflows for all annuity types processed in December increased nearly 13%, or over $860 million, to $7.8 billion from $6.9 billion in November.
  • Subtracting out flows from inflows, net cash flows decreased 2.5% to $1.84 billion in December from $1.9 billion in November.
  • The top 10 insurance companies accounted for over 69% of all inflows processed in December and over 68% of all inflows processed in 2011.
  • Five hundred sixty one (561) annuity products saw positive net flows in December, while 2,264 annuity products saw negative net flows, where the amount redeemed exceeded the amount invested.
  • For the full year, 700 annuity products had positive net flows and 2,450 experienced negative net flows.

The overall trend in inflows has been slightly down for the year, while the trend in net flows has been slightly up.

Transactions processed by DTCC show an increasing percentage of inflows being directed into IRA accounts in 2011, and a decreasing percentage of inflows directed into non-qualified accounts.

Non-qualified accounts are receiving less than 40% of cash flows. After remaining relatively flat for the past several months inflows into 401(k) plans jumped from $392 million in November to almost $749 million in December.

Looking at the net cash flow (subtracting out flows from inflows) distribution displays the greater persistence, or “stickiness,” of investments into qualified plan accounts. In 2011 regular IRA accounts took the lion’s share of positive net flows with 77%. 401(k) plans attracted 13%, and non-qualified accounts attracted only slightly less than 6% of positive net flows, far from the 39% of inflows going into these accounts.

In August 2011, DTCC joined forces with the Retirement Income Industry Association (RIIA) to analyze cash flows by RIIA-defined broker/dealer distribution channels and product categories. For the six distribution channels defined by RIIA, the following are the percentages of inflows processed by the I&RS in December:

  • Independent broker/dealers – 25%
  • Wirehouses – 23%
  • Regional broker/dealers – 15%
  • Bank broker/dealers – 12%
  • Insurance broker/dealers – 9%
  • Others – 16%

DTCC, through its subsidiaries, provides clearance, settlement and information services for equities, corporate and municipal bonds, government and mortgage-backed securities, money market instruments and over-the-counter derivatives. It is also a leading processor of mutual funds and insurance transactions, linking funds and carriers with their distribution networks.

DTCC’s depository provides custody and asset servicing for more than 3.6 million securities issues from the United States and 121 other countries and territories, valued at US$36.5 trillion. In 2010, DTCC settled nearly US$1.66 quadrillion in securities transactions. DTCC has operating facilities and data centers in multiple locations in the United States and overseas.   


Personal financial stress affects employee performance and retirement savings, HR survey shows

A survey of employer-sponsored financial education initiatives shows that U.S. workers’ money worries are impacting their work performance and retirement savings plans.

The survey from the Society for Human Resource Management asked HR professionals key questions, including, “In the past 12 months, have employees been more likely to dip into their employer-sponsored retirement savings plans compared with previous years?” More than half—55%—of HR professionals agreed while 17% strongly agreed. A little less than a quarter, or 24%, disagreed, and three percent strongly disagreed.

When asked the impact of employees’ personal financial challenges upon work performance, roughly one in five—22%—of HR professionals cited a “large impact.” Sixty-one percent noted “some impact” while 16% responded, “slight impact.” Only two percent of HR professionals observed “no impact” upon workers.

“The source of money woes is unsurprising but the toll it’s taking on both workers and their employers, in addition to the persistence of the weak economy, are all troubling issues,” said Mark J. Schmit, Ph.D., SPHR, vice president of research at SHRM.

A closer look at the impact on work performance shows that:

  • 47% of HR professionals noticed employees’ struggle with their “ability to focus on work”;
  • 46% noticed issues with “overall employee stress”;
  • 26% observed a negative impact on “overall employee productivity”;
  • 24% said money woes are leading to “employee absenteeism and tardiness”;
  • 20% are concerned about “overall employee morale”;
  • 12% noticed a negative impact on “overall employee health” ; and
  • 7% said “working relationships with other employees” are the least impacted.

To understand what employer-sponsored financial education programs need to cover, the survey examined the sources of personal financial stress. Nearly half—49%—of HR professionals said employees are stressed by an “overall lack of monetary funds to cover their personal expenses.”

SHRM surveyed 458 randomly selected HR professionals from its membership.

Actuaries identify four national priorities

The American Academy of Actuaries has released what it considers key policy priorities needed to restore the nation’s fiscal health and financial security, saying it “hopes the president will place these priorities high on his policy agenda this year. There are mounting risks facing important public programs and private systems critical to the nation’s retirement security and financial strength, and the actuaries urge all policymakers at the joint session of Congress to work together toward viable and sustainable solutions.

“Failure to act to address these significant financial problems makes them more difficult to successfully manage and mitigate,” said Dave Sandberg, president of the American Academy of Actuaries.

Priority: Achieve long-term sustainability of the Social Security and Medicare programs

The actuaries believe that recent efforts to curb deficits and address the nation’s fiscal challenges have been missed opportunities to restore both programs’ financial viability and provide security to future generations of retired Americans.

Specifically regarding Social Security, the actuaries renew their recommendation to policymakers to restore actuarial balance to the program by including an increase in the retirement age in any reform measure. Life expectancy improvements have increased the program’s payout of benefits and system costs. An increase in the retirement age, however, would help stem this cost growth and lead to a more financially sustainable system.

Priority: Achieve retirement security through new retirement framework

Policymakers also must address the challenges of longevity risk, inflation risk, investment risk, and their effects on retirement security. Actuaries had considerable concerns regarding adverse selection and sustainability with the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) program adopted as part of the Affordable Care Act, and, in 2011 the Department of Health and Human Services indicated that it would not implement the program. A renewed focus on meeting the long-term care needs of an aging population is needed. Providing consumers with greater financing options for long-term care services and supports should also be a part of any new retirement framework.

Priority: Achieve goals of health reform

The American Academy of Actuaries believes curbing health care spending growth, reducing the number of uninsured, increasing access to affordable health coverage, and improving health care quality are fundamental to providing health security to all Americans.

Priority: Successfully manage financial systemic risk 

Actuaries believe that regulatory systems will better anticipate future systemic risk by incorporating sound risk management principles. The new regulatory regimes should employ the appropriate oversight, expertise and accountability necessary to mitigate the effects of risks that could threaten the stability of the nation’s financial system.

The American Academy of Actuaries, which has 17,000 members, assists public policymakers on all levels and sets qualification, practice, and professionalism standards for actuaries in the United States.

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved

The Abandonment of an Ideal

On the RIJ homepage this week, you’ll find a table listing the most common occupations among the 1.13 million householders whose taxable earned incomes are over $380,0000 and therefore greater than the incomes of 99% of American households. 

The controversy over “one-percenters” has produced some anguish over social inequality as well as some humor ever since the Occupy Wall Street movement turned it into a slogan of protest against the perceived injustices of the financial crisis—specifically, the public bailouts of large financial firms amid widespread unemployment and foreclosures.

Scott Adams, the cartoonist behind Dilbert, has been drawing a series of strips where Wally, Dilbert’s fellow cubicle rat, wins a billion dollars in a discrimination suit and joins a one-percent club whose members wear Conehead hats and pig snouts tied to their faces with string.  (How could cubicle rats maintain their sanity without a daily dose of Dilbert?)

But the whole “one-percent” controversy seems flawed. The calculus in annuity research papers baffles me, but simple arithmetic tells me that one-percent of anything is, by definition, an exclusive subset. Assuming a stable number of households, a wannabe-household can join the one-percent only by knocking out a current one-percenter.

Unless we live in Garrison Keillor’s Lake Wobegon, we can’t all be above average, let alone perch in unison atop the flagpole of society. Conversely, except in a homogenous nation, where the sole couture is Mao suits (or Nehru jackets or Izod polo shirts; take you pick) the emergence of a top one percent is mathematically inevitable.

There’s another flaw in the one-percent argument that, I think, weakens its power as a rallying cry.  When many of today’s one-percenters were younger, they studied hard to reach the 99-percentile of the Iowa Basic Skills test, or the Scholastic Aptitude Test, or the Civil Service Examination, or what have you. If they ran in a race with 100 participants, they tried to win. You can’t expect financial one percenters to feel conflicted about having done exactly what was expected of them for so long.

If you aren’t a one-percenter, you probably know a few. The cardiac surgeon who owns all three lots at the end of my leafy cul-de-sac is probably a member. He lives in peace with the retired insurance agency owner across the lane, with the chemical engineer in the next house, with the widowed math teacher and even with the writer who works in an office in the basement of a stone-and-aluminum-siding ranch house three doors down.  

That writer is not among the financial one-percent, but he’d be a hypocrite if he resented those who are. From the deck behind his house, he can look across a valley carpeted with closely set apartments, tract homes and rowhouses, which together make up most (let’s say 99%) of the local housing stock. He lived there once, and there’s nothing wrong with it. But he’s grateful for the zoning rules (Big government!) that prevent further construction in his current neighborhood.      

My point is that the “one-percent” controversy misses the point. There’s nothing wrong with earning a taxable $380,000 or with earning any other distinction. Income inequality isn’t the issue. Wealth disparity is the issue. It’s the elephant (and donkey) that sits in the corner of our political living room.

Apparently, even high-earning Americans don’t prefer the current wealth disparity. Very few people do. This point has been made most effectively by Dan Ariely, the behavioral economist, who a few years ago asked Americans of all political loyalties, incomes, sexes, etc., how they thought ownership of wealth is distributed in America, and how they thought it should be distributed.

His survey (see below) showed that wealth in America is more concentrated among the top 20% (it has over 80%) than people generally believe (they think the top 20% has 60% of the wealth). More important, wealth is much more concentrated than they believe would be ideal (with only 30% to 40% of the wealth going to the top quintile). 

The gulf between the reality of wealth distribution in American and our ideal wealth distribution is what the “one-percent” controversy is really about. It’s about the abandonment of an ideal.



© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.

Lion’s Share

 ING’s U.S. Retirement division is the latest to join the in-plan annuity trend, offering participants in its 52,000 defined contributions plans a chance to protect the income-producing power of their account balances by wrapping them in stand-alone living benefits.

Three insurers—ING Life, AXA Equitable Life, and Nationwide Financial—will provide the lifetime income guarantees, which ING calls MGWBs, or minimum guaranteed withdrawal benefits. AllianceBernstein, which is majority-owned by AXA, provides the technology framework for the program and will manage the annuity assets.

Stand-alone living benefits, or SALBs, which were introduced in late 2007, are gaining importance for the retirement income industry. Insurance companies have long offered group annuities to retirement plans; SALBs allow them to sell guarantees to individual participants.   

Asset managers like SALBs because they create a vehicle that potential keeps a participant’s assets in the plan for life—assets that might otherwise end up in a rollover IRA, to be managed by a competitor. A SALB also helps plan sponsors fulfill a perceived fiduciary responsibility to help participants prepare for a secure retirement.

The program is brand new, so none of ING’s 52,000 plan sponsors have yet had a chance to consider the ING Lifetime Income Protection program, as the new offering is called. So the level of interest on the part of sponsors and participants remains to be seen. Earlier marketers of in-plan annuities include Prudential, John Hancock, and Great-West.

Front-end and back-end

Here’s how ING LIP will work, from the participants’ perspective. First, participants invest in one of ING’s proprietary collective trust target date funds, whose glidepaths end at age 65 with a 50/50 stock/bond allocation.

Beginning at age 48, TDF assets gradually begin to migrate to variable annuity separate accounts managed by asset manager AllianceBernstein and are protected by the MGWB, which costs one percent of the subaccount assets. When the participant reaches age 65, 100% of the assets are protected, and the participant can begin drawing them down, typically at a rate of 5% a year. Alternately, participants can withdraw money from the account at any time, subject to pro rata reductions in the guaranteed income basis.

“We conducted our own research and, given the economic times, we found that many participants are concerned about financial security in retirement,” said Rick Mason, president of Corporate Markets for ING U.S. Retirement. “There are two risks that are troubling them—the risk that the market will go down, and longevity risk. We’re looking for a solution that will help participants address those risks.”

The backend of the system, which participants won’t see, is AllianceBernstein’s GATES platform (It stands for “Guarantee Aggregation, Trading and Expensing System”), where participating insurance companies—in this case, AXA Equitable Life, ING Life, and Nationwide Financial—compete on an auction-style basis to provide the variable annuity guarantee to each chunk of assets that moves from a target date fund to the variable annuity subaccount.

 “The funds move from the target equity managed funds and purchase income through the multi-insurer platform. AllianceBernstein will provide the platform and management of the index portion of the portfolio,” Mason told RIJ. “Every quarter, as income is purchased, each insurer will have an amount allocated to them.

“It’s like an auction process that optimizes, for that period, the greatest amount of monthly benefits that can be purchased by each participant. ING is the recordkeeper, the investment manager and provides an insurance guarantee. We’re pulling it all together and we have responsibility for administering the program.”

In effect, ING is leveraging a critical piece of Secure Retirement Strategies, AllianceBernstein’s proprietary in-plan annuity program, which was launched in 2010. Last October, United Technologies became the first plan sponsor to adopt Secure Retirement Strategies, offering it to its $15 billion, 102,000-participant defined contribution plan.

In that deal, the three insurers were AXA Equitable, Nationwide Financial and Lincoln Financial. Lincoln’s lack of participation in the ING deal was seen as a reflection of the fact that it competes directly with ING in the small to mid-sized retirement plan market, rather than the inability of the GATES platform to accommodate more than three insurers.

Two paths to success

Mark Fortier, who leads AllianceBernstein’s Secure Retirement Strategies program, said ING Retirement could have created an in-plan annuity on its own, providing both the investments and the insurance, but chose to partner with AllianceBernstein because they believe that the open architecture approach is more likely to be embraced by plan sponsors than single-insurer programs.

“They could have gone it alone,” Fortier told RIJ, “but this is about getting adoption and traction in the industry.”

“There are two schools of thought” in the retirement income industry,” he added, explaining that some see the path to growth through competition among providers while others see a path to greater success through collaborations. “The question is not, ‘Who is better?” he said. “It’s, ‘How do we provide comfort to the fiduciary?’”

According to AllianceBernstein’s research, the multi-insurer approach appeals to plan sponsors less because they’re worried about diversifying the risk of insurer insolvency, than about ensuring price competition among insurers and securing ample capacity for new business.

In pitching the in-plan annuity concept to sponsors, Fortier also likes to posit a link between the availability of lifetime income options and a higher rate of contributions by DC plan participants. Before the crisis, he said, participants were motivated to contribute by watching the growth of their accounts. Post-crisis, participants will be motivated by watching the growth of their future monthly income stream.

With its big footprint, ING Retirement is in a position to vastly broaden the availability of in-plan annuities. It is a giant in the small-plan segment of the U.S. defined contribution market. Soon to be spun off from its parent, Netherlands-based ING Groep N.V., and assume a new brand name, it provides recordkeeping services for millions of plan participants, mainly at plans with fewer than 5,000 participants each and less than $150 million in assets.

Only Fidelity and Vanguard are bigger. According to the ING Retirement Plans website, the company ranks first among plan providers in number of plans with 52,000, second in number of participants with 6.4 million, and third in defined contribution plan assets under management, with $277 billion.

By comparison, Fidelity Investments reports 11.7 million participants in 20,600 plans. Vanguard is a full-service provider to 3.2 million participants in over 2,500 large plans, and provides investments to another 8,500 plans, according to the company.

Helped and hurt by the crisis

ING Retirement grew substantially in size in 2008, when ING Groep N.V. paid about $900 million for CitiStreet, one of the country’s largest retirement plan recordkeepers. CitiStreet was born in 2000 as a joint venture between Citigroup and State Street Corporation. Thanks to Citigroup’s need to raise cash during the financial crisis, ING became one of the top three players in the U.S. retirement plan business.

But the financial crisis also hurt ING’s parent. The giant Dutch insurer required a $12.8 billion bailout from the Dutch government, which it is gradually paying back, in part by divesting assets. Last year, ING Groep agreed to sell its ING Direct banking business to Capital One, the credit card company, for $9 billion. It intends to spin off its other U.S. units, including the retirement plans division, in an IPO.

ING Groep reported last week that it would not pay a dividend to shareholders until it had repaid all of its bailout funds to the Dutch government. The firm still needs to repay about 30% of its bailout. It also has to split up its banking and insurance assets by the end of 2013 to comply with requirements attached to the bailout.

The firm reduced its holdings in Southern European sovereign debt by 1.2 billion euros in the fourth quarter of 2011, according to a company statement. In 2011, ING reduced its total exposure to the debt of Southern European countries by 4 billion euros, but still has approximately 2 billion euros of their sovereign debt on its balance sheet. Last Thursday, ING announced that it was abandoning plans for an initial public offering of its combined Asian and European businesses, citing turbulence in the equity markets.

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.

The Deleveraging Blues

Macroeconomic indicators for the United States have been better than expected for the last few months. Job creation has picked up. Indicators for manufacturing and services have improved moderately. Even the housing industry has shown some signs of life. And consumption growth has been relatively resilient.

But, despite the favorable data, US economic growth will remain weak and below trend throughout 2012. Why is all the recent economic good news not to be believed?

First, U.S. consumers remain income-challenged, wealth-challenged, and debt-constrained. Disposable income has been growing modestly—despite real-wage stagnation—mostly as a result of tax cuts and transfer payments. This is not sustainable: eventually, transfer payments will have to be reduced and taxes raised to reduce the fiscal deficit. Recent consumption data are already weakening relative to a couple of months ago, marked by holiday retail sales that were merely passable.

At the same time, US job growth is still too mediocre to make a dent in the overall unemployment rate and on labor income. The US needs to create at least 150,000 jobs per month on a consistent basis just to stabilize the unemployment rate. More than 40% of the unemployed are now long-term unemployed, which reduces their chances of ever regaining a decent job. Indeed, firms are still trying to find ways to slash labor costs.

Rising income inequality will also constrain consumption growth, as income shares shift from those with a higher marginal propensity to spend (workers and the less wealthy) to those with a higher marginal propensity to save (corporate firms and wealthy households).

Moreover, the recent bounce in investment spending (and housing) will end, with bleak prospects for 2012, as tax benefits expire, firms wait out so-called “tail risks” (low-probability, high-impact events), and insufficient final demand holds down capacity-utilization rates. And most capital spending will continue to be devoted to labor-saving technologies, again implying limited job creation.

At the same time, even after six years of a housing recession, the sector is comatose. With demand for new homes having fallen by 80% relative to the peak, the downward price adjustment is likely to continue in 2012 as the supply of new and existing homes continues to exceed demand. Up to 40% of households with a mortgage – 20 million – could end up with negative equity in their homes. Thus, the vicious cycle of foreclosures and lower prices is likely to continue – and, with so many households severely credit-constrained, consumer confidence, while improving, will remain weak.

Given anemic growth in domestic demand, America’s only chance to move closer to its potential growth rate would be to reduce its large trade deficit. But net exports will be a drag on growth in 2012, for several reasons:

  • The dollar would have to weaken further, which is unlikely, because many other central banks have followed the Federal Reserve in additional “quantitative easing,” with the euro likely to remain under downward pressure and China and other emerging-market countries still aggressively intervening to prevent their currencies from rising too fast.
  • Slower growth in many advanced economies, China, and other emerging markets will mean lower demand for US exports.
  • Oil prices are likely to remain elevated, given geopolitical risks in the Middle East, keeping the US energy-import bill high.

It is unlikely that US policy will come to the rescue. On the contrary, there will be a significant fiscal drag in 2012, and political gridlock in the run-up to the presidential election in November will prevent the authorities from addressing long-term fiscal issues.

Given the bearish outlook for US economic growth, the Fed can be expected to engage in another round of quantitative easing. But the Fed also faces political constraints, and will do too little, and move too late, to help the economy significantly. Moreover, a vocal minority on the Fed’s rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee is against further easing. In any case, monetary policy can address only liquidity problems – and banks are flush with excess reserves.

Most importantly, the US – and many other advanced economies – remains in the early stages of a deleveraging cycle. A recession caused by too much debt and leverage (first in the private sector, and then on public balance sheets) will require a long period of spending less and saving more. This year will be no different, as public-sector deleveraging has barely started.

Finally, there are those tail risks that make investors, corporations, and consumers hyper-cautious: the eurozone, where debt restructurings – or worse, breakup – are risks of systemic consequence; the outcome of the US presidential election; geo-political risks such as the Arab Spring, military confrontation with Iran, instability in Afghanistan and Pakistan, North Korea’s succession, and the leadership transition in China; and the consequences of a global economic slowdown.

Given all of these large and small risks, businesses, consumers, and investors have a strong incentive to wait and do little. The problem, of course, is that when enough people wait and don’t act, they heighten the very risks that they are trying to avoid.

Nouriel Roubini is chairman of Roubini Global Economics (www.roubini.com) and Professor at the Stern School of Business, NYU.

Investors more optimistic in 4Q 2011: John Hancock

For the fourth quarter of 2011, the John Hancock Investor Sentiment Index score is +15, an improvement from the annual low of +10 measured in the year’s third quarter.  

The fourth quarter survey was conducted in late November through early December of 2011. The John Hancock Investor Sentiment Index is a quarterly poll of approximately 1,000 investors, and reflects the percentage of those who say they believe it is a “good” or “very good” time to invest, minus those who feel the opposite.

Many of those surveyed “feel better about investing in retirement vehicles, like 401(k)s and IRAs,” according to a release. “Three out of four investors said they believe that now is a good or very good time to be investing in retirement products such as 401(k) plans and IRAs (73% each). Both of these figures represent meaningful increases over last quarter’s lows (66% for 401(k)s and 67% for IRAs in Q3).”

“Investors are dealing with market uncertainty by further diversifying their investments,” observed Bill Cheney, chief economist for John Hancock. “Half of the investors surveyed say it is a good time to invest in balanced mutual funds, and about three-quarters say they plan to invest in mutual funds in 2012.”

More than half of the investors surveyed said they expect to be in a better position financially two years from now compared with today. A little more than a third of investors think they are in a better financial position today compared with two years ago; 41% said they are in about the same position, and 25% said they are worse off.

Three-quarters of American investors (72%) believed that consumer spending this holiday season would help the U.S. economy and stock market.  Most (61%) planned to spend the same amount of money on the holidays as they did in 2010, though 25% said they planned to spend less. About a third (31%) said they planned to cut back on gifts to friends and colleagues, while 83% planned to spend the same amount or more on family.

Most (65%) believe that fewer than 10% of Americans actually make and keep New Year’s resolutions. However, those who are employed say that saving for retirement is their top financial priority for 2012. More than a quarter (27%) intend to trim household budgets and reduce debt.

Financial New Year’s resolutions appear directly related to investors’ primary concerns for the new year ahead, which include declining investment values (37 percent) and not being able to accumulate enough savings for retirement (18 percent.)

Other findings for Q4 2011 include:

  • Investors continue to think long-term (95%) and are focused on savings (90%).
  • A greater share of investors (62%, compared to 53% in Q3) feel that now is a bad or very bad time to hold cash in the form of CDs or money market funds.   
  • The national debt (63%) and the cost of healthcare (61%) remain as issues investors are most concerned about.  Consistent with Q3 results, more than half (54%) say they are highly concerned about the unemployment rate.
  • Just one in three (37%) are very concerned about oil and gas prices, compared to 62% who worried about them in the second quarter of 2011.
  • Only 20% of investors feel that gold will perform the best in the coming six months, compared to 32% who felt gold would outperform other investment types in the third quarter.

John Hancock’s Investor Sentiment Survey is a quarterly poll of 1,001 investors with household incomes of at least $75,000 and assets of $100,000 or more. Mathew Greenwald & Associates conducted the survey in November and December 2011.    

Wirehouses are down but far from out: Cerulli

Cerulli projects that in 2013 the wirehouse channel will remain the largest distribution channel despite an anticipated decline of its share of assets under management to 35% in 2013 from 43% in 2010. 

Wirehouses were hurt by the 2008 bear market and by their perceived roles in the financial crisis, Cerulli’s Bing Waldert said. While the financial advisor industry grew from to $11.2 trillion in 2010 from just under $11 trillion in 2007, wirehouse assets dropped to $4.8 trillion from $5.5 trillion during that same period. 

Nonetheless, the four wirehouses (Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, UBS, and Wells Fargo Advisors) remain the best capitalized in the asset management industry, and much of their recent market share loss came from planned attrition, as they forced out lower producing, less profitable advisors.

Wirehouses may be less concerned about market share than profitability, Cerulli noted. While scale is essential to these firms, they may want to serve only the most productive advisors. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, for one, has publicly stated that it seeks a 20% profit margin from its wealth management business. Both Morgan Stanley Smith Barney and Bank of America/Merrill Lynch have trimmed middle management layers, aggressively cutting lower producing advisors.

“The future growth of wirehouses is through their largest advisor teams,” said Waldert. “Not via organic growth, but by supplementing these teams with junior advisors in order to free the principal advisors to continue their focus on business development.”

He warned, however, “It must be understood where these advisors will come from if these firms are not successfully hiring new advisors into the industry. Second, given the number of flexible options for an advisor, any cost-cutting in the name of profits that affects these advisors’ businesses could cause them to leave the firm if they feel that they are not being adequately supported.” 

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.

One in five millionaires would pay more tax

When asked to comment on Warren Buffett’s now-famous call for the wealthy to pay more taxes and give more to charity, 49% of U.S. millionaires agreed but said they’re not in Buffett’s league, 29% said Buffett was wrong, and 22% agreed.

Those statistics were among the findings of the eighth annual Wealth and Values Survey by PNC Wealth Management, a unit of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.  

Despite the nation’s financial troubles, the number of millionaires who agree or strongly agree with the statement, “I have an obligation to give back to my community,” remains at 59%, the same number as in 2008.

To improve the national economy, 31% of millionaires would “reduce taxes on individuals and businesses,” while 20% support raising taxes on the wealthy, 15% would reduce the costs of Social Security, Medicare and/or Medicaid, 15% would reduce the defense budget, and 10% would provide new government stimulus by the government.  

The number of millionaires concerned about their ability to give to charities has declined to 11% from 20 percent in 2008, according to the survey of 555 Americans with assets of $1 million or more. 

The survey showed that 22% intend to cut back on charitable giving, while 46% plan no change and 21% plan to increase their giving.

In addition, 83% believe that investment in private business and industry is the best way to improve society. At the same time, 70% feel a responsibility to help the less fortunate and 64% believe they should give “substantial sums” to charities to improve society.

The number who donated between $25,000 and $999,000 to charity doubled in 2010, to 24%, from 12% in 2008. 

Other findings in the Wealth and Values Survey by PNC, which is among the nation’s top 10 bank-owned wealth management firms, also revealed insights about the following issues:

  • Greta Garbo syndrome: 65% say they “want to be left alone by politicians” to enjoy their earned wealth however they choose, and 80% view reinvestment as the key to progress.
  • Institutional dysfunction: 76% feel that the U.S. government has serious flaws in how it works, 85% say the U.S. political system has serious flaws, and 47% believe the U.S. financial system is flawed.
  • Response to higher taxes: If taxes increase, nearly four in 10 millionaires would “change their investment strategy” and one in four would give less to charity. Thirteen percent would work less, 7% would work harder, while 41% would not change anything.
  • Bearish on the future: 71% of millionaires believe they are “much better off compared to parents at this same age.” Only 10% believe their children will be able to say the same when they are older.   

Survey Methodology

The Wealth and Values Survey was commissioned by PNC to identify attitudes about wealth among high-net-worth individuals, how it affects their lives and their needs in managing wealth. Artemis Strategy Group conducted the online survey from September 15 to October 11, 2011.

The Bucket

Jefferson National completes management buyout  

Jefferson National Financial has completed an $83 million management buyout financed by Financial Partners Fund (a unit of Citi Capital Advisors), The Stephens Group and private investor Eric Schwartz. The buyout was led by Mitchell H. Caplan, Jefferson National’s CEO.   

The company, which sells variable annuities to Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) and fee-based advisors primarily as tax deferral vehicles, charges a flat insurance fee of $20 a month rather than commissions or expense ratios, and has taken advantage of the trend away from commission-based sales by advisors.

In a statement, Caplan said, “Starting in 2005, Jefferson National completely re-engineered the way variable annuities are bought and sold with a singular focus on serving fee-based advisors.

“Transforming the product with a proprietary technology platform, and rebuilding the distribution from the traditional wholesaler-driven model to a unique direct-marketing model, we have been able to dramatically reduce costs, create greater consumer value and become the leading variable annuity provider to the fee-based channel.”  

  A former CEO of E*Trade Financial, Caplan joined Jefferson National in 2010, reuniting with a leadership team that worked on Telebank, the nation’s first direct bank, and E*Trade. The team includes Laurence Greenberg, president of Jefferson National and former COO of Telebank, and David Lau, chief operating officer of Jefferson National. During their tenure, Telebank’s deposits grew from $200 million in 1994 to more than $8 billion in 2000. During Caplan’s tenure as CEO of E*Trade, revenue increased from less than $1 billion in 2003 to approximately $3 billion in 2006.

Donna MacFarland named CMO at Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial Group has named Donna MacFarland chief marketing officer of its Retirement Plan Services business. She will lead marketing initiatives, including the development of integrated business-to-business and business-to-consumer marketing strategies, and will manage Retirement Plan Services Participant Communications and Education offering.

MacFarland joined Lincoln in May 2010 as marketing director. She reports to Chuck Cornelio, president of Retirement Plan Services for Lincoln Financial.

Prior to joining Lincoln, MacFarland was founder and president of Symphonic Marketing, LLC, a marketing strategy consultancy focused on partnering with companies to drive growth through insights generation and marketing planning. Previously, she held senior brand management and marketing positions with The Vanguard Group, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Citibank, and Smith Barney.

Thomas Mann and Laura Dagan join F-Squared board 

Thomas F. Mann and Laura P. Dagan have joined the Board of Directors of F-Squared Investments, which currently has nearly $6 billion in assets under management or model manager agreements, the company said in a release.

Mann is a managing director and senior banker at Société Générale (SocGen) in New York. Dagan retired in 2010 as chairman of Dwight Asset Management Company, a fixed income and stable value asset management firm that invests on behalf of institutional clients including retirement funds and endowments.  

Mann and Dagan are the fourth and fifth members to join F-Squared’s board, which includes the firm’s president and CEO, Howard Present; vice chairman, George McClelland; and outside director Steve Ricci, the co-founder of OneLiberty Ventures and Special Partner at Flagship Ventures.

Mann, a Chartered Financial Analyst, graduated from State University of New York in 1972 and holds an MBA from New York University and a JD from Fordham Law School. He has also completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School. 

Dagan, a Chartered Financial Analyst, graduated from Bucknell University in 1974 and attended the Women’s Director Development Program at the Kellogg School of Management. She has also completed the Advanced Management program at Harvard Business School.

The Bucket

Jefferson National completes management buyout  

Jefferson National Financial has completed an $83 million management buyout financed by Financial Partners Fund (a unit of Citi Capital Advisors), The Stephens Group and private investor Eric Schwartz. The buyout was led by Mitchell H. Caplan, Jefferson National’s CEO.   

The company, which sells variable annuities to Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) and fee-based advisors primarily as tax deferral vehicles, charges a flat insurance fee of $20 a month rather than commissions or expense ratios, and has taken advantage of the trend away from commission-based sales by advisors.

In a statement, Caplan said, “Starting in 2005, Jefferson National completely re-engineered the way variable annuities are bought and sold with a singular focus on serving fee-based advisors.

“Transforming the product with a proprietary technology platform, and rebuilding the distribution from the traditional wholesaler-driven model to a unique direct-marketing model, we have been able to dramatically reduce costs, create greater consumer value and become the leading variable annuity provider to the fee-based channel.”  

  A former CEO of E*Trade Financial, Caplan joined Jefferson National in 2010, reuniting with a leadership team that worked on Telebank, the nation’s first direct bank, and E*Trade. The team includes Laurence Greenberg, president of Jefferson National and former COO of Telebank, and David Lau, chief operating officer of Jefferson National. During their tenure, Telebank’s deposits grew from $200 million in 1994 to more than $8 billion in 2000. During Caplan’s tenure as CEO of E*Trade, revenue increased from less than $1 billion in 2003 to approximately $3 billion in 2006.

 

Donna MacFarland named CMO at Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial Group today has named Donna MacFarland chief marketing officer of its Retirement Plan Services business. She will lead marketing initiatives, including the development of integrated business-to-business and business-to-consumer marketing strategies, and will manage Retirement Plan Services Participant Communications and Education offering.

MacFarland joined Lincoln in May 2010 as marketing director. She reports to Chuck Cornelio, president of Retirement Plan Services for Lincoln Financial.

Prior to joining Lincoln, MacFarland was founder and president of Symphonic Marketing, LLC, a marketing strategy consultancy focused on partnering with companies to drive growth through insights generation and marketing planning. Previously, she held senior brand management and marketing positions with The Vanguard Group, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Citibank, and Smith Barney.

 

Thomas Mann and Laura Dagan join F-Squared board 

Thomas F. Mann and Laura P. Dagan have joined the Board of Directors of F-Squared Investments, which currently has nearly $6 billion in assets under management or model manager agreements, the company said in a release.

Mann is a managing director and senior banker at Société Générale (SocGen) in New York. Dagan retired in 2010 as chairman of Dwight Asset Management Company, a fixed income and stable value asset management firm that invests on behalf of institutional clients including retirement funds and endowments.  

Mann and Dagan are the fourth and fifth members to join F-Squared’s board, which includes the firm’s president and CEO, Howard Present; vice chairman, George McClelland; and outside director Steve Ricci, the co-founder of OneLiberty Ventures and Special Partner at Flagship Ventures.

Mann, a Chartered Financial Analyst, graduated from State University of New York in 1972 and holds an MBA from New York University and a JD from Fordham Law School. He has also completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School. 

Dagan, a Chartered Financial Analyst, graduated from Bucknell University in 1974 and attended the Women’s Director Development Program at the Kellogg School of Management. She has also completed the Advanced Management program at Harvard Business School.

The Bucket

Jefferson National completes management buyout  

Jefferson National Financial has completed an $83 million management buyout financed by Financial Partners Fund (a unit of Citi Capital Advisors), The Stephens Group and private investor Eric Schwartz. The buyout was led by Mitchell H. Caplan, Jefferson National’s CEO.   

The company, which sells variable annuities to Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) and fee-based advisors primarily as tax deferral vehicles, charges a flat insurance fee of $20 a month rather than commissions or expense ratios, and has taken advantage of the trend away from commission-based sales by advisors.

In a statement, Caplan said, “Starting in 2005, Jefferson National completely re-engineered the way variable annuities are bought and sold with a singular focus on serving fee-based advisors.

“Transforming the product with a proprietary technology platform, and rebuilding the distribution from the traditional wholesaler-driven model to a unique direct-marketing model, we have been able to dramatically reduce costs, create greater consumer value and become the leading variable annuity provider to the fee-based channel.”  

  A former CEO of E*Trade Financial, Caplan joined Jefferson National in 2010, reuniting with a leadership team that worked on Telebank, the nation’s first direct bank, and E*Trade. The team includes Laurence Greenberg, president of Jefferson National and former COO of Telebank, and David Lau, chief operating officer of Jefferson National. During their tenure, Telebank’s deposits grew from $200 million in 1994 to more than $8 billion in 2000. During Caplan’s tenure as CEO of E*Trade, revenue increased from less than $1 billion in 2003 to approximately $3 billion in 2006.

 

Donna MacFarland named CMO at Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial Group today has named Donna MacFarland chief marketing officer of its Retirement Plan Services business. She will lead marketing initiatives, including the development of integrated business-to-business and business-to-consumer marketing strategies, and will manage Retirement Plan Services Participant Communications and Education offering.

MacFarland joined Lincoln in May 2010 as marketing director. She reports to Chuck Cornelio, president of Retirement Plan Services for Lincoln Financial.

Prior to joining Lincoln, MacFarland was founder and president of Symphonic Marketing, LLC, a marketing strategy consultancy focused on partnering with companies to drive growth through insights generation and marketing planning. Previously, she held senior brand management and marketing positions with The Vanguard Group, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Citibank, and Smith Barney.

 

Thomas Mann and Laura Dagan join F-Squared board 

Thomas F. Mann and Laura P. Dagan have joined the Board of Directors of F-Squared Investments, which currently has nearly $6 billion in assets under management or model manager agreements, the company said in a release.

Mann is a managing director and senior banker at Société Générale (SocGen) in New York. Dagan retired in 2010 as chairman of Dwight Asset Management Company, a fixed income and stable value asset management firm that invests on behalf of institutional clients including retirement funds and endowments.  

Mann and Dagan are the fourth and fifth members to join F-Squared’s board, which includes the firm’s president and CEO, Howard Present; vice chairman, George McClelland; and outside director Steve Ricci, the co-founder of OneLiberty Ventures and Special Partner at Flagship Ventures.

Mann, a Chartered Financial Analyst, graduated from State University of New York in 1972 and holds an MBA from New York University and a JD from Fordham Law School. He has also completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School. 

Dagan, a Chartered Financial Analyst, graduated from Bucknell University in 1974 and attended the Women’s Director Development Program at the Kellogg School of Management. She has also completed the Advanced Management program at Harvard Business School.

Bond funds grow, stock funds shrink in 2011

Fund investors withdrew an estimated net $22 billion from stock and bond mutual funds in the US in December. Net outflows from long-term mutual funds were $3 billion in November. The numbers, provided by Strategic Insight, included open-end and closed-end mutual funds, excluding ETFs and funds underlying variable annuities.

 “Investor sentiment remains cautious,” said Avi Nachmany, SI’s director of research. “Although the S&P 500 rose 1% in December, fund shareholders are still suffering from volatility fatigue following the ups and downs of the second half of 2011. Portfolio rebalancing may result in reduced outflows from US equity funds in January, especially if the US stock market continues its 2012 rise.”

For the full-year 2011, long-term mutual funds saw net inflows of just $65 billion (excluding ETFs and VA funds), a dramatic drop from the net inflow of $247 billion in 2010. 

Equity funds

Looking solely at equity funds, net outflows from U.S. funds increased to $24 billion in December from $11 billion in November, while net outflows from international and global equity funds rose to $11 billion in December from $3 billion in November.

For all of 2011, domestic equity funds saw net outflows of $85 billion and international equity funds saw net inflows of $34 billion, for a net outflow of $51 billion from all long-term equity funds.

International equity funds were hurt by the Eurozone debt crisis and by U.S. dollar appreciation. The average international stock fund lost 12% last year, while the average US equity fund was about flat.

Utility funds, long/short funds and multi-alternative funds posted positive flows in December.  “While there is a lack of enthusiasm for US equity funds, investors continue to seek out solutions aimed at lessening portfolio volatility and reducing correlation,” Nachmany said.

Bond funds

Bond funds saw net inflows of $13 billion in December, including $8 billion to taxable bond funds and $5 billion to municipal bond funds. Investors continued to see bond funds as a refuge as well as an income source. 

Intermediate-term, high-yield and short-term municipal funds led the December bond fund flows. Muni bond funds have been enjoying a revival of demand as fears of widespread defaults have faded.

For the full year 2011, bond funds saw $116 billion in net inflows, where strong net inflows of $129 billion to taxable bond funds were slightly offset by net outflows of $13 billion from municipal bond funds.

Money market funds

December was the second consecutive month of positive net flows to money funds, with $39 billion in net inflows following November’s net inflows of $42 billion. For the full year 2011, money market funds saw aggregate net outflows of $135 billion due to near-zero yields.

ETFs

In December, U.S. Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) experienced $16 billion in net inflows. Large-cap blend, large-cap growth and large-cap value ETFs led the way with combined net flows of $10.5 billion for the month. The biggest ETF, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF, saw $4.9 billion in net inflows in December. Precious metals ETFs saw net outflows in December.

For full-year 2011, ETFs (including ETNs) saw net inflows of $115 billion. That followed net inflows of $111 billion in 2010. It also marked the fifth consecutive year that US ETFs saw $100 billion or more in net inflows. At the end of 2011, US ETF assets stood at $1.06 trillion.

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.

 

Winners of PLANSPONSOR 401(k) Survey announced

From the perspective of customers, who are the best 401(k) providers?

Three service providers stood out in PLANSPONSOR’s annual Defined Contribution Survey this year: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Diversified Retirement Corporation, and BMO Institutional Trust Services.  Those providers won the greatest number of service “cups” in the survey’s five main asset classes, based on the evaluations of nearly 7,000 employers of all sizes across the United States.

PLANSPONSOR is the nation’s leading source of retirement plan information for employers.

Other standout rankings were earned (in alphabetical order) by American Trust, Ascensus, DailyAccess Corp., J.P. Morgan, MBM Advisors, Milliman Inc., The Newport Group, TIAA-CREF, Transamerica, and Vanguard.

The survey results — and rankings of 47 providers by their plan sponsor clients — were profiled in a recent issue of PLANSPONSOR magazine. The winners will be honored in New York City on March 29th, 2012 at Pier 60 of the Chelsea Piers.

Quinn Keeler, senior vice president and head of Research at Asset International, Inc., parent company of PLANSPONSOR, said providers are awarded “Best in Class” status based on top-quartile performance in five designations defined by plan size. Providers who won the most “cups” in each asset category were designated this year as Gold, Silver, or Bronze Cup winners.

The top providers in each asset category were: 

Plan size/assets

Provider 

Designation 

Cups

Micro (<$5 million)

 

 

 

 

BMO Instit Trust Svcs

Gold  

22 cups

 

Ascensus  

Silver  

21 cups

 

DailyAccess Corp.  

Silver  

21 cups

 

T’america Ret Svcs

Bronze  

19 cups

Small ($5 m-$50 m)

 

 

 

 

BMO Instit Trust Svcs

Gold  

23 cups

 

American Trust

Silver  

22 cups

 

MBM Advisors

Bronze  

20 cups

Mid (>$50 m-$200 m)

 

 

 

 

BMO Institutional Trust Svcs 

Gold  

23 cups

 

The Newport Group

Silver  

20 cups

 

Milliman, Inc.  

Bronze  

16 cups

Large (>$200 m-$1 bn)

 

 

 

 

Diversified Ret. Corp

Gold

21 cups

 

The Newport Group

Silver  

18 cups

 

Vanguard 

Bronze  

16 cups

Mega (>$1 billion)

 

 

 

 

BofA Merrill Lynch

Gold

14 cups

 

J.P. Morgan

Silver  

10 cups

 

TIAA-CREF  

Bronze    

  8 cups

Other 401(k) providers cited by PLANSPONSOR across 23 categories can be found at http://www.plansponsor.com/2011_DC_Survey.aspx

The Bucket

Guardian Life to hire over 800 financial representatives   

Throughout 2012, the Guardian Life Insurance Company of America will be hiring over 800 financial representatives by targeting and recruiting career-changers as part of its distribution force recruitment strategy, the company said in a release.  

 “Unlike employers with a more traditional view of the job market, we welcome career changers and experienced professionals who may have recently experienced a downsizing or who are working in unfulfilling jobs where their skills are undervalued,” said Meg Skinner, Guardian Life’s chief distribution officer.   

Skinner said Guardian’s need for qualified sales reps reflects the public’s increasing demand for safer financial products. “The same economic issues causing problems in other industries make the secure, reliable products Guardian offers an even more valued commodity,” she said.

Guardian Life also announced it is a founding member of the newly reorganized, not-for-profit SPARK Institute, created from the merger of two leading retirement plan industry associations, SPARK and The SPARK Institute. The resulting association represents a retirement plan service providers and asset managers.

The SPARK Institute will broaden its support of employer-sponsored retirement plans through a more active public policy agenda and increased industry partnerships. Guardian is one of of ten leading retirement plan industry members that funded the transition.

 

Most middle-income elderly satisfied with Medicare: Bankers Life 

Most (82%)middle-income Americans on Medicare are “extremely” or “very” satisfied with their access to health care and with the quality of the care they receive under the program, according to a study by the Bankers Life Center for a Secure Retirement.

The study, Retirement Healthcare for Middle-Income Americans, surveyed two groups: 400 pre-Medicare Boomers (age 47 to 64) and 400 older adults (age 65 to 75). Both groups had annual household incomes of $25,000 to $75,000.

Medicare recipients tended to be more satisfied with their health care than were people still using private health care. Only 2% of Americans on Medicare were not satisfied with the federal program. By contrast, 24% of Boomers not yet on Medicare said they were dissatisfied with the quality of healthcare they receive. Only 46% were “extremely” or “very” satisfied with their care. 

Medicare’s future was on the minds of most people. More than eight out of ten (87%) of those surveyed were concerned about the future of Medicare; 71% believe Medicare benefits will be reduced. Currently, an estimated 22% of middle-income Boomers are uninsured and consider Medicare their healthcare safety net, the study said. About 85% of Americans over age 65 are expected to rely on Medicare for health insurance.

Regarding healthcare reform, the CSR study showed that more than half of middle-income Americans over the age of 47 don’t know whether or not it will benefit them. A third (36%) don’t expect reform to benefit people in their age group; only 13% believe that reforms, often called Obamacare, will be beneficial. 

The Bankers Life and Casualty Company Center for a Secure Retirement’s study Retirement Healthcare for Middle-Income Americans was conducted in September 2011 by the independent research firm, The Blackstone Group. The complete report can be viewed at www.CenterForASecureRetirement.com.

 

Professional Testing acquires Society of Certified Senior Advisors

Professional Testing Inc., a credentialing and assessment company with a portfolio of corporate-sponsored credentials, has acquired the Society of Certified Senior Advisors (SCSA), which provides education and credentialing to professionals who serve seniors.  

 SCSA will continue to operate under its current name as a division of Professional Testing and will maintain offices and present staffing near Denver. It “will draw on the credentialing, exam development and accreditation management of Professional Testing’s team headquartered in Orlando, Florida. Ed Pittock, founder of SCSA, will continue to serve as a consultant to SCSA,” the companies said in a release

Four years ago, the Society of Certified Senior Advisors received accreditation of their Certified Senior Advisor (CSA) credential through the National Commission for Certifying Agencies (NCCA), the standards and accrediting division of the Institute for Credentialing Excellence (ICE). 

Professional Testing has been a developer of credentialing and assessment programs serving professional associations, federal and state government agencies and private industry since 1971. It serves more than 50 client organizations representing more than 200 credentials.  

 

Americans’ family fealty is strong but ‘not unlimited’: MetLife   

Americans’ sense of financial obligation to family members is strong and born out of love and generosity, but does have limits, according to a new study by the MetLife Mature Market Institute.

Multi-Generational Views on Family Financial Obligations: A MetLife Survey of Baby Boomers and Members of Generations X and Y reports that Baby Boomers (b. 1946–1964), Gen Xers (b. 1965–1976) and Gen Yers (b. 1977–1990) agree that parents should support children through their college years, help with tuition (90%) and step in to provide financial assistance during a financial emergency – not of the child’s doing.

They stop short, however, at paying 100% of college tuition if the cost is particularly high, and at bailing their kids out of debt when the debt is from overspending. Fewer feel responsible for contributing to the down payment on a house – just seven percent of those surveyed said they feel an absolute or strong responsibility to do so.

The online survey of 2,123 Americans, ages 21 to 65, was conducted from June 29 to July 20, 2011. Respondents were selected from among Harris Interactive’s online research panel. To qualify, respondents had to have household incomes of at least $40,000 ($30,000 if Gen Y). Boomers and members of Gen X were required to have a dependent—either a spouse or a child; Gen Yers did not necessarily have dependents.

The data was weighted by age, gender, education, and race/ethnicity to best reflect this target population. The online survey was conducted by Mathew Greenwald & Associates.   

 

The Principal and Edward Jones team up for retirement plan sales  

Principal Financial Group announced a new retirement plan sales alliance relationship with Edward Jones. Effective January 4, 2012, The Principal is approved as a preferred retirement plan product provider for Edward Jones’ clients. The formal agreement allows Edward Jones’ financial advisors to sell defined contribution plans with The Principal.

Of Edward Jones’ 12,000-plus financial advisors, 7,000 currently market 401(k), 403(b) or 457 plans.

“Our relationship with Edward Jones significantly broadens our distribution channels and will help continue the strong sales growth we’ve experienced through national broker-dealers,” said Dan McGee, vice president, managing director of distribution, retirement and investor services, The Principal.

“We believe this relationship with The Principal is a great fit for Edward Jones,” said Edward O’Neal, principal at Edward Jones. “The retirement plan market is a strong focus of Edward Jones and the quality of our strategic alliance is very important to providing a strong menu of products, services and solutions to help our financial advisors serve the needs of plan sponsors in their communities.”

 

Mutual of Omaha allies with Securities America

Mutual of Omaha Retirement Plans Division has announced a new strategic alliance with Securities America that will make Mutual’s retirement plans available to Securities America’s financial professionals nationwide.

 The relationship is part of Mutual’s strategic goal of doubling its retirement plans product distribution and advisor support programs to producers affiliated with key broker-dealers across the nation, said Chuck Lombardo, president and CEO of Retirement Marketing Solutions, Inc. (RMS), a Mutual of Omaha subsidiary.

Securities America has recently increased its commitment to the retirement plans market and has chosen Mutual of Omaha as one of its select group of retirement plan providers. In turn, this alliance is part of Mutual’s commitment to develop long-term relationships with producers that are dedicated to retirement plans, Lombardo said.

Securities America advisors will also have access to educational tools and resources through Mutual of Omaha. This includes The 401k Coach Program, fiduciary support programs as well as third-party investment comparisons from FiRM to help demonstrate a commitment to fair and competitive fees.

 

SPARK releases template for retirement plan disclosures

The SPARK Institute has released spreadsheet templates of its Data Layouts for Non-Registered Investment Product Disclosures to Retirement Plan Participants that were published in September, said Larry Goldbrum, General Counsel.  “We received feedback from our membership and others in the retirement plan community that spreadsheet templates of the Data Layouts would make it easier for, and increase the likelihood that, non-registered investment product providers would adopt the standards,” Goldbrum said.  The availability of the spreadsheet templates adds another level of standardization to this process and makes it easier for companies who do not want to program for transmitting ASCII files to adopt the standards,  Goldbrum said. 

The Data Layouts are designed for use by non-registered investment product providers (e.g., bank collective investment funds, non-registered “fund of funds,” separately managed accounts and annuities) and record keepers to share information that retirement plan administrators must disclose to participants under the Department of Labor’s participant disclosure regulations, Goldbrum said.  There are two templates, one for variable rate of return investments, employer securities and annuities, and another for fixed rate of return investment products.  The spreadsheet templates are substantively the same as the original narrative version of the layouts and are posted, along with instructions for their use, on The SPARK Institute website at http://www.sparkinstitute.org/comments-and-materials.php.  They are available at no charge for use by anyone.

Ohio National launches ‘Low-Vol’ VA options

It’s both surprising and not surprising that Cincinnati-based Ohio National Life is the first variable annuity issuer to offer funds that incorporate the TOPS/Milliman volatility-controlled, futures-driven, ETF-based investment technology.

Surprising, because conservative mutually owned life insurers like Ohio National usually leave radical innovation up to their more aggressive publicly held counterparts. Not surprising, because, in this case, the innovation seeks less risk, not more.

“Ohio National is a little unique in the VA space. We’re one of the few mutuals with a presence among the top 20 VA issuers. Usually it’s companies with access to fresh capital that have a more aggressive presence,” said Steve Murphy, FSA, senior vice president, Capital Management.

On January 3, Ohio National Life introduced a new GLWB Plus rider for its ONcore suite of variable annuities. The new rider offers contract owners a distinctive 5.25% payout at age 65 (single-life) along with the existing 8% annual simple-interest deferral bonus that can double the income base after 10 years without withdrawals.

To earn that extra quarter-percent payout, purchasers have to agree to put at least half their premium into TOPS Protected Balanced, Moderate Growth or Growth ETF funds (67 bps; 92 bps in 12b-1 version) and no more than half into any of four funds—an Invesco Balanced Risk Fund, the AllianceBernstein Dynamic Allocation Fund, the Federated Managed Volatility Fund II or the Legg Mason Dynamic Multi-Strategy Portfolio.  

The key to the product is the TOPS—it stands for The Optimized Portfolio System—which was featured in the November 23, 2011, issue of RIJ. Using a short futures strategy in addition to dynamic asset allocation, it gives Ohio National the return-predictability it needs to offer such expensive benefits. It also uses a hedge strategy to offset risk.

Here’s how the fund prospectus describes the technique:

The sub-adviser selects individual futures contracts that it believes will have prices that are highly correlated (negatively) to the Portfolio’s ETF positions. The sub-adviser adjusts short futures positions to manage overall net Portfolio risk exposure.

During periods of rising security prices, the amount of futures contracts will ratchet upwards to preserve gains on the Portfolio’s ETF positions. During a market decline, the value of the Portfolio’s ETF securities will decrease while the futures contracts will increase in value.

Following declines, a downside rebalancing strategy will be used to decrease the amount of futures contracts used to protect the Portfolio. The sub-adviser also adjusts short futures positions to realign individual hedges when the adviser rebalances the Portfolio’s asset allocation profile.

What’s somewhat controversial about this approach, which Milliman designed, is that it uses the client’s own money to pay for the futures in the TOPS funds, in addition to charging the client for the GLWB Plus rider (currently 95 bps for single-life; maximum 200 bps). The mortality and expense risk charge is 1.35% a year. There’s also an account expense charge of 35 bps.

 “Overall, it’s better for the consumer,” Murphy told RIJ this week. “Lower volatility funds do perform better over the long run. The client won’t see the same run-ups, but in the financial crisis, some of these risk-managed funds would have experienced losses of 10% instead of 40%. People don’t need to be out there swinging for the fences.”

For Ohio National, which ranked 20th in VA sales in 2011, with $1.2 billion in premiums during the first three quarters of the year, the new offering represents a significant shift in product design. In the early part of the last decade, it focused on the guaranteed minimum income benefit product, whose insurance benefit requires the client to buy an income annuity after a deferral period.

 “You wouldn’t necessarily have been able to observe this, but we did have a conservative approach to VA guarantees,” Murphy said. “We were reinsuring our living benefit riders from the point of inception in 2002 until reinsurance became unavailable in 2008. Our reinsurance served s well through the financial crisis.” The company switched its emphasis to the GLWB in 2010, retooling within a period of months.

The TOPS strategy gives Ohio National the protection it needs in order to offer a competitive 5.25% payout at age 65 in a world where 5% is the norm. “We went with TOPS to preserve the income bands, Murphy said. To compete, “you can lower the price or raise the benefit, and marketing felt that raising the income bands was the better move.” 

The newly enriched product benefits should help Ohio National sell through third-party distributors. “About 20% of our VA sales come from our own broker dealer and our career agents,” said Jeff Mackey, FSA, Ohio National’s director of Annuity Product Development. “Of the other 80%, about 40-50% comes from independent advisors and about 30-40% from the national wirehouses. Bank sales account for no more than 5% to 10% of the 80%.” 

Every product needs a story line, and Murphy has one.  “I use the analogy of an airline,” he told RIJ. “ An airline can’t sell tickets for flights five years from now because it can’t hedge the volatility of fuel prices. We’re different. For us, the targeted volatility strategy keeps the cost of hedging predictable. Going forward, I think the only sustainable product designs will be in the context of risk-levered funds.”  

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.

Lincoln Financial team will study consumer decision-making

A newly six-member team dedicated to building “an understanding of the end-consumer’s decision-making process as it relates to their financial future” has been formed by Lincoln Financial Group.

Emily Pachuta will lead the team, as head of Consumer Insights group within Lincoln’s Insurance Solutions/Retirement Solutions division. She reports to Kristen Phillips, head of IS/RS Marketing and Strategy.

“The Consumer Insights team is charged with capturing quantitative and qualitative information about consumers that can better inform product design and distribution decisions across Lincoln’s four core businesses of Annuities, Life Insurance, Group Protection, and Retirement Plan Services,” the company said in a release.

“Industry studies and reports typically focus on why consumers don’t adopt solutions,” said Pachuta in a statement. “Lincoln takes a different approach, focusing on why people do adopt solutions. Basically, 90% of decision-making is irrational and subconscious, so a deeper understanding of decision-making drivers will help us, as well as financial advisors, better understand the actions that will improve one’s financial life.”

Pachuta joined Lincoln in September of 2007. She has served as Retirement Income Marketing Director and vice president and head of Strategic and Product Marketing.  Prior to Lincoln, she was Director of Field Marketing at Merrill Lynch’s Global Private Client Group. She earned a B.A. from Yale and an MFA from New York University.

Lincoln also announced that Daniel P. Gangemi has joined the Consumer Insights team, reporting to Pachuta, as a Director focusing on the Retirement Plan Services business. He will focus on understanding retirement plan participants, plan sponsors, retirement-focused intermediaries, and the broad retirement plan marketplace. He will also have responsibility for generating insights on exploratory consumer segments, including Mass Market, Mass Affluent, and Gen X & Y.

Gangemi has a background in both market research and the retirement plan market. He has held positions at Prudential Investments, OppenheimerFunds, and AllianceBernstein. He has a B.A. and M.A. in English from the City University of New York.

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.

Aria Retirement Solutions aims stand-alone living benefit at RIA market

Aria Retirement Solutions (Aria) has announced the first of a series of RetireOne guaranteed income solutions that serve independent registered investment advisors (RIAs) operating fee-only practices.    

RetireOne Transamerica, the initial product, is a stand-alone living benefit (SALB). It wraps a fixed contingent annuity of the type usually found in variable annuities with guaranteed living benefits around a portfolio of mutual funds and ETFs offered by American Funds, iShares, PIMCO, Vanguard, and Dimensional Fund Advisors. Transamerica Advisors Life provides the income guarantee. The broker-dealer is Protected Investors of America.

The RetireOne Transamerica solution is the first of what Aria CEO David Stone said will be several RetireOne income solutions provided by Aria in partnership with major insurance carriers.  

“RetireOne’s income solutions will provide latitude for investment allocation by RIAs to employ a wide spectrum of strategies and adjust exposure to risk for their clients,” said Neil Wilding, Aria executive vice president and national sales director in a release.

Headquartered in San Francisco, Aria was founded by executives who had been at Charles Schwab, Fidelity and other firms. Aria’s Retirement Solutions Advisor Center in Louisville, Ky., will support the new products.  

Lockwood Advisors introduced the first stand-alone living benefit in late 2007, in a partnership with the Phoenix Companies. It was a way to let money managers add a guaranteed lifetime income guarantee to whatever portfolios they happened to be managing. The cost of the rider varied according to the risk profile of the underlying portfolio.   

In August 2009, Nationwide Life Insurance announced a deal to add a guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit (GLWB) rider to certain unified managed accounts (UMAs) at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (MSSB). Select Retirement, as Nationwide’s GLWB was called, could be applied to assets in MSSB’s Select UMA, a product launched by Smith Barney in April 2008.  

In August 2010, Investors Capital Corporation (ICC), a broker-dealer and investment advisory unit of Investors Capital Holdings, Ltd., launched the Investor Protector series: a managed investment account paired with a stand-alone income benefit. The account combined Investors Capital Advisory Services’ (ICA) series of asset allocation models with a stand-alone lifetime benefit that offered the investor a 5% lifetime income stream, regardless of market conditions.  

The initial investment account value established the client’s Retirement Income Base (RIB). The investor was able to lock in a higher RIB if the account value was higher on the anniversary date for an additional fee. At age 65, the client could draw a 5% stream of income based on the highest, locked-in RIB. A spousal benefit was also available.

© 2012 RIJ Publishing LLC. All rights reserved.