Archives: Articles

IssueM Articles

Old-Age Poverty Higher in U.S. Than Most Developed Countries

In a report published earlier this year, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development said that nearly one-fourth (24%) of over-65-year-olds in the United States have incomes lower than half the country’s median household income (the OECD definition of poverty).

The high risk of old-age poverty in the United States is mainly due to the relatively low level of the Social Security safety net, which provides the average U.S. retiree with an income that’s only 18% of average earnings, the 279-page report said. Only Hungary has a lower value at 16%, while the OECD average is 27%.

The financial crisis hurt all of the 30 developed countries that belong to the OECD. Collectively, private pension funds in those countries, which include all of the major Western nations plus the Pacific Rim nations of Japan, Korea, Australia and New Zealand, lost US$5.4 trillion in value in 2008.

The pension fund losses were highest within the United States, mainly because U.S. pension funds had about 59% of their assets in equities when the crisis hit, compared with an average of 36% in equities in the 20 OECD countries where data are available.

In the United States, private pensions and other investments provide 44% of retirement incomes, which is 24 percentage points more than the OECD average of 20%. Comparable figures are found in Canada (at 41.0%) and Ireland (at 42.9%).

The report, “Pensions at a Glance 2009: Retirement Income Systems in OECD Countries,” can be obtained from the OECD.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

With Stocks, the “Enemy Is Us”

In a provocative new series of Issue Briefs, the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College will examine whether stocks are suitable as long-term investments for savers. In doing so, the Center is challenging the conventional wisdom that stocks are the best long-term investment, not just for young investors but even for those who have recently retired.

The first brief, by economists Richard W. Kopcke and Dan Muldoon, asserts that “variations in business activity and profits account for a relatively small share of the risk in stocks over holding periods as long as 10 years. Instead, variations in shareholders’ valuation of earnings account for most of the volatility of returns.”

The brief, entitled “Why Are Stocks So Risky?” also says that 10 years may not be an adequate time horizon for investing in stocks, contrary to popular belief.

“The risk attributed to valuations of earnings tends to diminish over investment horizons as long as 40 years or more, because the value of stocks broadly follows the trend in GDP and corporate profits,” the authors said. “Although stocks are better investments for the very long run, these periods can seem too long to suit savers who lack the capacity or the willingness to absorb significant financial risks in the interim.”

In a section entitled “We have met the enemy and it is us”—a reference to a 1971 comment by the opossum Pogo from Walt Kelly’s comic strip of the same name—the authors suggest what John Maynard Keynes is said to have believed: that investor behavior rather than corporate fundamentals cause most of the stock market’s ups and downs.

“Shareholders’ reactions to economic conditions and to recent trends in stock prices create most of the volatility in the returns on equity,” they said. “Although stock prices vary substantially in response to cycles in business activity and earnings, these factors account for a small share of the risk in stocks over holding periods as long as 10 years or more.”

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

With New Accounting Standard, AIG Remains Profitable

American International Group earned $455 million in the third quarter of 2009, its second period in the black, but management expects continued earnings volatility, National Underwriter reported.

The $455 million profit compared with a loss of $24.5 billion for the same period in 2008. For the first nine months of 2009, AIG said it lost $2.08 billion, compared with a $37.6 billion loss for the same period in 2008.  Life insurance and retirement services operating income was $2.2 billion in the third quarter, up from $1 billion a year earlier.  

The U.S. government has owned a 79.9% interest in AIG since last fall’s bailout. For the second quarter in a row, AIG officers did not hold a public teleconference to discuss earnings.

In addition to improved market performance and mutual fund income, AIG gained from “the new investment impairment accounting standard adopted in the second quarter of 2009,” which drove a reduction in net realized capital losses, said Robert H. Benmosche, AIG’s chief executive officer.   

But these gains “were offset by impairments in the asset management segment, higher current accident-year losses related to credit crisis exposures and prior accident-year losses in general insurance and lower income from life insurance and retirement services investment-linked and annuity products globally,” he said.

Concerning its government debt, AIG said its total balance outstanding from a Federal Reserve Bank of New York facility is $41 billion, including $35.8 billion of net borrowings and $5.2 billion of accrued compounding interest and fees, with availability of $24.2 billion. Interest and fees accrued have been charged against AIG’s earnings.

 The company said as of Sept. 30, it had drawn down $3.2 billion, including $2.1 billion from $29.8 billion available under a Series F Preferred Stock Department of the Treasury Commitment. AIG’s total balance outstanding from the Fed Commercial Paper Funding Facility was listed at $9.6 billion among AIG Funding, Inc., Curzon Finance LLC and Nightingale Finance LLC.

Asset sales to repay the government, AIG said, are expected to generate $5.6 billion after taxes and talks are underway with potential buyers of other businesses.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Prudential To Launch TV Ad Campaign

Prudential Financial launched its “Morse Code SOS” television advertising campaign on Oct. 25, to run through 2010. The campaign kicked off Oct. 18 with a full-page ad in the New York Times and also includes Internet ads, billboards at airports, elevator advertisements and an electronic billboard in Times Square.

The new Prudential television ads will show buildings in large cities lighting up in Morse code sequences, representing organizations sending out a call, or SOS, for better solutions for asset management, secure retirement guidance and benefits for employees.

In other news, Prudential executives said in a conference call that gross variable annuity sales for the quarter reached a record $5.8 billion, compared to $2.5 billion a year ago. Net variable annuity sales were $4.4 billion in the third quarter.

In a transcript of the call, the executives noted that all of the company’s variable annuity living benefit options and about 60% of all of the firm’s variable annuity account values that are protected by income guarantees are subject to an “auto rebalancing feature.”

With this feature, customer funds are automatically reallocated to fixed income investments during market declines, thereby limiting the decline in the account values and protecting the company’s ability to support the contracts’ income guarantees. When the market rises, money returns to each client’s investment choices. The process is entirely automated.

“With about 85% of our current quarter variable annuity sales including the HD living benefits we are continuing to migrate our book of business toward auto rebalancing products. With the improving financial markets, about $5.5 billion dollars of account values that had been rebalanced to fixed income investments during the market downturn returned to client selected investments over the past two quarters,” the firm said.

In August, Prudential introduced a new variable annuity living benefit product feature called HD 6 plus, which offers a 6% annual roll up for protected value rather than the previous product’s 7%.

While “it’s reasonable to assume that a portion of our third quarter sales reflected purchases of the earlier product in anticipation of the introduction of the new one, HD 6 plus continues to offer the differentiated value proposition that has driven our success in the marketplace. And initial indications are that it is being well received by clients and their advisors,” the earnings call transcript said.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Taiwan’s Population Growth Trends, 1952-2006

Taiwan’s Population Growth Trends, 1952-2006
Year Total
Population
(000)
Birth Rate
(%)
1952 8,128 4.66
1955 9,078 4.53
1960 10,792 3.95
1965 12,628 3.27
1970 14,676 2.72
1975 16,150 2.30
1980 17,850 2.34
1985 19,258 1.80
1990 20,353 1.66
1995 21,471 1.55
2000 22,216 1.38
2005 22,690 0.91
2006 22,790 0.90
Source: Accounting Office, Taiwan Statistical Data Book, 2007: 24-25

RIJ Reaches a Milestone

Back in June 2009 I noted in this column that Retirement Income Journal would become available only to paid subscribers at some future date. Well, the future is now.

Starting with our next issue, we’ll be offering RIJ to individual subscribers for $149 a year—an intentionally low price that suits the times we live in. Group subscriptions will be available at a graduated cost, based on the number of subscribers in each group.

As a subscriber, you’ll continue get what no other print or online publication delivers—timely news and original analysis of the retirement income industry. As editor and principal writer of RIJ, I plow through the pertinent literature, trek to as many conferences as I can, and talk to the players every day. Then I publish what I believe will interest you.

It’s never easy to charge for what used to be given away. But readers tell us that RIJ is worth paying for. We’re the only “honest broker” for information in this industry, they’ve said. We’re the only publication that consistently “puts the news in perspective.”

The past six months have been exciting. But the year ahead will be more so. We’ll broaden and deepen our coverage of the retirement industry—a fast-growing sphere that embraces elements of the securities industry, the insurance industry, the academic world, and government. We’ll drill deeper into the issues that matter to advisors, to financial services industry executives, and to those in the 401(k) world. Over time, we’ll evolve into a multidimensional portal with databases, discussion groups and archives.

In 2010, the retirement industry will face a number of important questions. How will health care reform change the game? Will we see higher taxes and inflation? What’s the future of compensation for advisors and producers? Do products like in-plan income options for 401(k) participants or annuity/LTCI hybrids have legs?

There’s a lot of ground to cover, but we’re committed to covering it. Retirement Income Journal will follow the Boomer retirement trend wherever it leads, and to forecast, as best we can, where it’s headed next. We invite you to join us.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

 

House Passes Historic Health Reform Bill

In a vote last Saturday night, the House of Representatives approved H.R. 3962, a bill that would extend health care coverage to all Americans at an estimated cost of $1.1 trillion over 10 years, according to various press reports.

Democrats voted 219 to 39 in favor of the bill while Republicans voted 176 to one against it. The measure would provide health insurance to tens of millions of uninsured. It authorized $2 billion for a subsidized public health care insurance program: the controversial “public option.” 

The expansion of coverage will be financed by a projected $440 billion reduction in Medicare spending over ten years, as well as new fees and taxes, including a 5.4% tax “of so much of the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer as exceeds” $1 million for those filing joint returns or $500,000 for single filers.  That tax would affect about one percent of America’s 114.5 million households, which receive about 18% of earned income.

The bill would also levy a 2.5% tax on “the first taxable sale” of a medical device, would tie reimbursements to nursing homes to the quality of care provided, and would calculate reimbursements under Medicare Advantage plans on a regional rather than a county-by-county basis. 

In terms of reforming the health insurance practices, the bill would require health insurers not to reject people with pre-existing medical conditions, to refrain from “dumping” of high-risk individuals from group plans, and require insurers to pay out at least 85% of their premiums in benefits.

The legislation would also eliminate lifetime limits on coverage, would require insurance companies to cover dependent young adults up to age 27, and would stop companies from eliminating medical benefits for retirees when they do not eliminate them for active employees. 

Under the bill, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will establish a $10 billion “temporary reinsurance program” to reimburse participating employment-based plans for up to 80% of claims of $15,000 to $90,000 from retirees over age 55 but not yet eligible for Medicaid and to their spouses, surviving spouses and dependents.

The bill would likely not have passed the House had anti-abortion Democrats not been able to tighten restrictions on coverage for abortions under any insurance plan that receives federal money.  

Health care reform still faces a tough test in the Senate, where passage requires more than a simple majority—at least 60 votes to assure passage—and where the two-senator-per-state rule gives conservative, sparsely-populated states in the South and West relatively more control over the legislative process. In the House, liberal, densely populated urban areas wield more voting power.   

Because a national health insurance program would be unsustainable if young, healthy people opted not to participate, the House legislation requires most Americans to obtain health insurance or face penalties. Most employers would have to provide coverage or pay a tax penalty of up to 8% of their payroll.

The bill would expand Medicaid and offer subsidies to help moderate-income people buy insurance from private companies or from the public option. It would also set up a national insurance exchange where people could shop for coverage at competitive rates.

In the past, low-income Americans have had access to health care through public hospitals. These have mainly been teaching hospitals linked to universities in major cities. Overwhelmed by demand from rising numbers of uninsured Americans, however, public hospitals have closed at a high rate during the past decade, according to Web sources.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Estimating Out-of-Pocket Health Care Costs in Retirement

Even if President Obama signs a health care bill this year, retired and soon-to-retire Americans still face plenty of uncertainty regarding their own physical health and their ability to cover all their out-of-pocket medical expenses in retirement.

Indeed, the risk of “unexpected health care needs and costs” always ranks near the top when Americans are surveyed about which retirement risks—longevity risk, inflation risk, stock market risk, and so forth—concern them most.

Unpredictability is part of what makes health-related risk so troubling. “Health care costs are very skewed,” said Anna Rappaport, a Chicago-based consulting actuary who studies retirement risks. “Each year, about 63% of all health care spending is accounted for by the 10% of the population that spends the most.” But no one knows if he or she will be among that 10%.

The fact that health care costs continue to rise faster than the overall rate of inflation also makes them unpredictable and hard for retirees to budget for. According to the Urban Institute, by 2030 even high-income retired couples will be spending twice as big a share of their disposable income on health care as they did in 2000.

And there’s the ever-present concern that a retiree might suffer a catastrophic illness or injury that overwhelms his or her health coverage. “Even if you have insurance, there might be maximum coverage limit of $1 million. Or the insurer might pay only $300,000 for cancer treatment that the hospital says costs $500,000,” Rappaport said.

Over the months ahead, Retirement Income Journal will publish a series of articles on the financial and non-financial risks that retired Americans face. We’ll examine the risks themselves, as well as the recommended ways to mitigate them. In light of last week’s passage of the “Affordable Health Care for America Act,” we’re starting the series with a look at health care cost risk.

Expect to Pay $200,000 to $300,000
Several groups have tried to estimate what the typical retiree’s out-of-pocket costs would be. If you limit costs to what a 65-year-old retired couple might pay for Medicare co-pays and deductibles and premiums for supplemental private insurance, the best estimates are between $200,000 and $300,000.

At the lower end, the Center of Retirement Research at Boston College has estimated that the average 65-year-old couple retiring today might spend $206,000 on health care in retirement. But for those retiring in 2020, the estimate jumps to $284,000. In 2008, Fidelity Investments suggested that health care costs could average $225,000 per couple. Richard Johnson, a researcher at the Urban Institute, told RIJ that the typical expenditure might be as low as $150,000 for many couples.

Estimates by the Employee Benefit Research Institute tend to be higher. Using Monte Carlo methodology, EBRI projected the amount of assets needed to cover health care costs in retirement 50%, 75%, and 90% of the time. The cost estimates varied between $194,000 and $635,000, on average, depending on the risk assumed and the level of prescription drug use.

These are averages, of course. The premiums for Medicare Advantage plans or for employer-sponsored retiree health benefits—which are increasingly rare—can vary widely from one part of the U.S. to another and from one company to another. Also, the costs of nursing home care or long-term care insurance do not figure in these estimates.

Practical steps
There are a number of preventive measures you and your clients can take to minimize or mitigate health care cost risks. They include:

  • Make room in your retirement budget for health care. When projecting annual living expenses in retirement, it will help to anticipate spending about $10,000 per year per couple on health insurance premiums, co-pays, deductibles and medications, even when Medicare coverage is in place. Adjust your savings rate accordingly. In the years when you spend less, think about putting that money back into savings.
  • Mind the gap between retirement and eligibility for Medicare. People who retire before age 65 but don’t buy private medical insurance run the risk of incurring huge medical costs if they become seriously ill. To eliminate this risk, don’t retire until age 65 or buy private insurance.
  • Supplement Medicare with a layer of private insurance. Of the respondents to the Society of Actuaries 2007 Risks and Process of Retirement Survey, 61% of retirees said they purchased supplemental health insurance or participate in an employer’s health plan and 14% planned to do so. The premiums will add to your out-of-pocket costs, but the coverage may save you money in the long run.
  • Buy long-term care insurance. Although long-term care cost risk is a separate retirement risk that we’ll discuss in a future story, it’s worth mentioning here. Nursing home costs can dwarf all other health care costs in retirement. For wealthy families with large amounts of legacy assets to protect, the cost of long-term care insurance may be relatively trivial. Depending on their risk preference, they may prefer to buy insurance even if they can afford to self-insure.
  • Become a smarter health care consumer. If medical costs continue to climb at their current rate, they will eventually claim an unsupportable share of retirement income. When that happens, retirees will need to economize. “You’ll find that once individual spending gets too high, people will just cut back. They will become more savvy consumers. They won’t get those extra tests. That will bring down spending to some extent,” said Richard Johnson.
  • Live a healthy lifestyle. You can minimize health costs by preventing illness through exercise and proper nutrition. But this is easier said than done. In a Society of Actuaries poll, 75% of retirees said they do this and 23% said they plan to, but the SOA pointed out that “these high percentages may be more indicative of wishful thinking than tangible action.”

Bottom line
The research suggests that the average retired couple will need to spend at least $200,000 over the course of retirement—assuming both spouses live to their life expectancies or longer—to cover Medicare deductibles and co-pays and premiums for private or employer-sponsored supplemental coverage.

One’s ability to handle these expenses depends on one’s income, of course. A retiree with an income of $120,000 can afford to pay $10,000 a year on health insurance and prescription drugs. But the same $10,000 would represent a much larger burden for the millions of retirees with incomes of $40,000 to $50,000.

Out-of-pocket health care spending as a percentage of after-tax income is expected to grow in the years ahead. In 2030, according to the Urban Institute, the poorest retired couples could spend more than 50% of their income on health care. Even the highest earners are expected to spend about 16% of income on health care two decades from now, up from less than 10% in 2000.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

To Prevent Inflation, Australia Hikes Baseline Interest Rate

The move by Australia’s central bank to raise rates to 3.25% from 3% by its central bank last month was not unexpected, as the Australian economy was the only one in the developed world to expand in the first half of 2009, according to press reports in IPE.com and elsewhere.

In fact, Australia managed to avoid recession, only seeing its economy contract in the last quarter of 2008. Its government has helped the economy with major stimulus spending of about US$35 billion, consisting of infrastructure projects and cash handouts to retirees and low- and middle-income families.

This helped the economy to grow 0.4% in the first quarter of this year, and by 0.6% in the second, rebounding from the 0.5% contraction between October and December 2008.

Prior to the rise, interest rates had plunged to a 49-year low-an emergency rate designed to deal with an emergency situation. Though some economists and industry groups had argued that the emergency rate should be left in place to make absolutely sure that the recovery had taken hold, the bank decided that there was a risk of inflation and unsustainable borrowing if it did not act now.

“The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) had widely advertised it was near to edging up rates from their extraordinary lows, and now it’s done so,” said Rory Robertson, interest rate strategist at Macquarie. “It will be a gradual move from an emergency rate of 3%, to a still-easy 4%.”

Mr. Robertson added that if the Australian economy continued to expand as expected, rates could return to “a more normal 5%” in the next year or two. Tuesday’s move is the first time the Australian central bank has increased interest rates since March 2008.

The Australian economy has also managed to avoid falling into recession thanks to the strength of its mining sector, which has continued to see strong demand from China for its iron ore and other commodities.

“The Australian economy is outperforming other advanced economies, and I guess many economists will see the decision today as a consequence of economic recovery,” said Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

MassMutual Retirement Services Posts Record Sales

September marked MassMutual Retirement Services Division’s highest sales month in history, the company said in a release. September sales totaled $979.2 million, representing the highest monthly total in the division’s 60-year history and contributing to record third quarter sales of $1.7 billion.

“A lot of plan consolidation is taking place and those plans that are changing providers want a seamless transition,” said Hugh O’Toole, senior vice president of sales and client management for the division. 

September’s sales results included plans under MassMutual’s fully bundled and TPA service models in defined contribution, defined benefit, nonprofit, Taft-Hartley and PEO markets, as well as roll-in and First Mercantile’s collective investment trust product.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Genworth Financial Announces Profitable Third Quarter

For the third quarter of 2009, Genworth Financial reported net income of $45 million, before provision for non-controlling interests, compared with a net loss of $258 million in the third quarter of 2008, the company said in a release. Net operating income before provision for non-controlling interests for the third quarter of 2009 was $106 million, compared with $220 million a year earlier. 

Retirement income fee-based earnings increased to $16 million from lower DAC (deferred acquisition cost) amortization attributable to positive equity market performance during the quarter. This was partially offset by lower fees from a decline in average AUM (assets under management) for the variable annuity product and higher taxes. On a sequential basis, earnings increased $5 million from $11 million as a result of improved equity market performance and lower taxes.

Total VA sales grew 41% sequentially to $217 million. Recently, Genworth launched RetireReady One, a more streamlined retirement income VA product with improved risk characteristics and flexible features that enable a more customized guaranteed income strategy.

The retirement income spread-based business had a net operating loss of $8 million compared to income of $16 million in the prior year. In the prior year, earnings included a $15 million tax benefit that did not recur. Earnings in the current period reflected lower investment income associated with holding higher cash balances and $5 million of unfavorable DAC unlocking related to a refinement of assumptions for spreads. A significant portion of these higher cash balances is targeted for reinvestment as noted previously. Total spread-based AUM remained relatively flat sequentially ending at $19.5 billion.

Genworth’s fixed annuity production in the quarter was down significantly and reflected a less attractive spread environment and a cautious stance regarding interest rates and related investment strategies. Going forward, fixed annuity production will remain targeted with a focus on risk-adjusted returns.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Record Retail Sales at Jackson National

During the third quarter of 2009, Jackson National Life Insurance generated record retail sales and deposits of $4.3 billion, an increase of 28% over the second quarter of 2009, and 44% higher than the third quarter of 2008, the company said in a release.

The third quarter of 2009 was the second consecutive quarter during which Jackson set a retail sales record. Retail sales and deposits during the first nine months of 2009 of $10.4 billion were up 17 % over the same period in 2008.

“Clients are increasingly placing business with providers that have demonstrated financial stability and consistency in their product suite,” said Clark Manning, Jackson’s president and chief executive officer.

During the first nine months of 2009, Jackson, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the United Kingdom’s Prudential plc, generated $6.7 billion in variable annuity (VA) sales, a 32% increase from the $5.1 billion recorded during the same period of 2008. Third quarter VA sales increased 93% year over year to more than $2.9 billion, a company record.

Jackson ranked fourth in new VA sales during the second quarter of 2009, with a market share of 7.2%, up from a ranking of 12th and a market share of 4.3% during the second quarter of 2008. During the first half of 2009, Jackson ranked second in variable annuity net flow (total premium minus surrenders, exchanges and annuitizations) and had the lowest outflows, as a percentage of VA inflows, in the industry.

Fixed index annuity (FIA) sales of $1.6 billion during the first three quarters of the year were more than double the $617 million recorded during the first nine months of 2008. Jackson’s third quarter FIA sales of $769 million were the highest quarterly total in company history. Sales of traditional fixed annuities during the first nine months of 2009 were $1.3 billion, compared to $2.2 billion during the same period of the prior year.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Urban Myth: Retirees Need $300,000 for Health Care

You’ve probably heard or read, with dismay, that the average Boomer couple should add an extra $300,000 to their “retirement number” to help cover their health care costs in retirement.

But this is an urban myth—or at least an exaggeration—according to Luis Fleites, vice president, retirement markets research, at the Financial Research Corporation in Boston. The much-quoted estimate from the Employee Benefit Research Institute was originally worded “up to” $300,000, he said.

A more accurate estimate is that, excluding potential nursing home costs, median health care spending will be about $4,500 a year, for people ages 65 to 74, Fleites told RIJ, with an estimated 21% of that group spending over $7,500 a year.

“We’re not trying to dispel the idea that health expenses will be an important factor, and even $4,500 is not an insignificant amount,” he said. “But the idea that you need three hundred grand for health care or you’re not going to make it isn’t necessarily true.”

The $300,000 figure is one of 10 “myths” that the FRC dispels in a new report, “Making Sense of Investor Needs in the Retirement Income Market.” The report is based on a May 2009 online survey of over 1,500 U.S. consumers ages of 45 and 74 with at least $100,000 in investable assets.

The report’s biggest takeaway? “One of our higher-level findings is that retirement is a personalized and customized event,” Fleites said. “People who look the same from the outside are very different in terms of their preparation for retirement. It depends on whether they have a pension, or have dependents. The conventional approach to retirement doesn’t apply anymore. It’s going to be customized going forward.”

Here are the ten purported myths, and their alternative explanations, from the new FRC report:

Myth: Retirement is an event.

Reality: Retirement is a complex process that, for the majority of boomers, is likely to unfold gradually over several years.

Myth: Boomers will retire earlier and live longer than prior generations, requiring very substantial savings to live comfortably.

Reality: Yes, many boomers (but certainly not all) have a longer life expectancy than prior generations, but the trend to retire earlier seems to be reversing itself.

Myth: Pension plans have disappeared, leaving boomers with nothing but Social Security and their savings.

Reality: While many pension plans have been terminated or frozen, many plans still exist.

Myth: Boomers are spendthrifts who have saved little, taken on large mortgages, and run up a substantial amount of consumer debt.

Reality: While this is true for some boomers, the PowerBoomers in our study typically have a considerable amount of home equity and low consumer debt.

Myth: Boomers have not been planners and have not faced retirement realities.

Reality: The majority of PowerBoomers have a retirement plan, even if it is informal.

Myth: Boomers are woefully unprepared financially for retirement.

Reality: This is certainly true of some boomers, and is true of many more boomers if we view retirement in its traditional sense. However, many of the PowerBoomers in our study are not planning on a traditional retirement.

Myth: Boomers are the Sandwich Generation, providing financial support to both parents and children.

Reality: It’s definitely true that boomers are providing financial support for adult children but the percentage of boomers providing financial support to parents is low, and likely to decline.

Myth: Boomers are at the tipping point, about to move from accumulation to decumulation.

Reality: Actually, the boomer generation spans a 19-year period, with the youngest boomers turning 45 in 2009. Plus, like prior generations, boomers will likely look primarily to retirement income solutions that do not draw down substantial amounts of principal, at least in the early years of retirement.

Myth: Boomers who work in retirement will do so primarily because they need the money.

Reality: Yes, money and benefits are likely to be strong motivators, but other reasons like staying active, healthy, and socially connected will play an important role.

Myth: Out-of-pocket health care costs could drain $295,000 from a typical retirement nestegg, according to a widely quoted EBRI study.

Reality: What people often omit when quoting this very thorough EBRI study is the phrase “as much as”, which precedes the $295,000 figure. In our study, we found the mean out-of-pocket health care costs for respondents 65 to 74 years old were around $4,500.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Red Zone Strategies

“If you are in the Red Zone, then you must export all of the risk to an insurance company,” writes Jim Otar in Chapter 44 of Unveiling the Retirement Myth. “For secure lifelong income, all your savings must be allocated to life annuities. You will need to cut back your expenses, because even if you use all your savings to buy a life annuity, the payments will be lower than the withdrawal rate that you were hoping for. The most effective remedy is to delay retirement.” 

Red Zone Strategies by Jim Otar

An Income Feather in BoA’s Hat

When Bank of America acquired Merrill Lynch in the fever of the financial crisis, BoA CEO Ken Lewis was like the proverbial dog that finally caught the car it was chasing. Lewis got the wirehouse he yenned for, but lost his job in the aftermath.

Lewis’ chair hasn’t been refilled, but life has settled enough at the firm for it to exploit the merger’s synergies. For instance, it has re-launched Merrill’s 2006 My Retirement Paycheck program under the trademark My Retirement Income.

“This is an evolution of My Retirement Paycheck,” Aimee DeCamillo, head of Personal Retirement Solutions for Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management told RIJ. “That was one of our initial forays” in this area.

The program will connect 15,000 financial advisors, supported by 800 retirement specialists, with Bank of America’s retail banking customers through a network of 6,100 offices and 18,000 ATM machines as well as online and mobile banking. 

“Merrill Lynch brought a leadership position in retirement, and Bank of America has a relationship with one out of every two households in an America,” DeCamillo said.  [Dan McNamara, who had led retirement initiatives at Bank of America, is no longer with the company, DeCamillo said. Two months ago, Andy Sieg was recruited from Citi to run Bank of America-Merrill Lynch Retirement Services. Sieg was at Merrill Lynch before moving to Citi.]

The new plan is “a comprehensive income plan created for the client. It asks, ‘What does next 12 months look like for you’ and looks at distinct pools of assets in the context of managing four primary risks-the traditional retirement risk components.”

The assets go into “periodic, distinct buckets geared to help take the emotion out of investing.  For instance, there’s a long-term bucket that protects against inflation and longevity risk. Or, it can be useful for the high net worth client who wants to set aside legacy assets,” she said.

“If an insurance product is suitable for the client and it complements the clients long-term plan, then an annuity can be included. But the [income solution] could be laddered bonds or CDs,” DeCamillo said.

The new program “is available to all our advisors, but there are always advisors on the leading edge and we’ve spent a lot of time with our top tier advisors,” she added. “There’s no fee for the service itself. It’s available through the regular retail relationships. We soft launched the product internally. We’ve created a whole host of seminars and training programs.”

Here’s how Merrill Lynch described My Retirement Paycheck three years ago: It “can track your income and spending, while frequently updating your portfolio’s value. They’ll also warn you if any of these deviate from your financial plan. They work by routing all your income — Social Security and pension checks, as well as interest and dividend income — into a single account held at the firm. Any money you spend should also be withdrawn from this single account.”

Here’s how BofA describes the new program:

Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management has launched My Retirement IncomeTM, a feature within the Merrill Lynch Retirement Income Service that connects customized retirement income planning with the Bank of America retail banking network.

My Retirement Income allows clients nearing or in retirement to automatically transfer funds from a consolidated Merrill Lynch cash management account into a Bank of America deposit account on a periodic basis for simplified retirement income distribution and management.

Retirement income transferred into a Bank of America deposit account can be accessed through the nation’s largest retail banking network, which includes more than 6,000 retail banking offices, more than 18,000 ATMs, mobile banking, and online banking. 

Merrill Lynch Retirement Income Service is a comprehensive retirement income management solution that:

  • Helps clients to convert their retirement nest egg into retirement income.
  • Enables Merrill Lynch advisors to help retirees track their spending behaviors, manage cash flow and adjust investment strategies to ensure that their savings last throughout their lifetime.


Also introduced today is the Merrill Lynch Retirement Income Framework, a proprietary retirement income planning and investment approach enabling Merrill Lynch advisors to advise clients on retirement income strategies, taking into account a client’s individual risk tolerance, retirement consumption needs, and appropriate asset allocation.

The approach was designed to better enable clients to meet short-term consumption needs, optimize long-term investment opportunities, and marshal excess savings to maximize the value of their legacies and intergenerational transfer of wealth.  Merrill Lynch Financial Advisors have access to this new framework to complement and evolve their existing strategies when working with clients. 

The foundation of the new Merrill Lynch Retirement Income Framework is a segmented investment approach best suited for clients nearing and in retirement that divides assets into three distinct portfolios: Consumption Funding (short-term savings and investments), Longevity & Income Replacement (intermediate-term investing), and Wealth Structuring (long-term investing).

The investment framework also takes into consideration and is designed to help mitigate common risks associated with retirement income plans, including longevity, inflation, asset allocation, healthcare and planning risks.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

The View from Taroko Gorge

I asked Josephine Lin, my tour-guide for a sightseeing trip through Taiwan’s spectacular Taroko Gorge, how she intended to pay for her retirement. She hesitated only a moment before sharing her life’s salient financial and personal details.

“I used to be a rich woman, with a house and a trading company,” the sturdy 51-year-old explained as we motored up and down the Gorge, a lush chasm carved through marble by a turquoise river. “Then I married a man who was handsome and tall” but unreliable.

He didn’t have the right “attitude” for business, she said, and squandered about half a million U.S. dollars, throwing good money after bad on a doomed enterprise. A personal financial tsunami followed and the couple lost everything.

More troubles followed. Her import-export business failed when customers and suppliers began trading direct over the Internet. She was forced to use her lump-sum state pension, equal to a month’s salary for each of the 25 years she contributed to it, to repay relatives who’d lent her money.

Four years ago, single again, Ms. Lin left teeming Taipei to live with her parents in Hua Lien, a banana-growing, stone-cutting city of 100,000 on Taiwan’s Pacific Coast. She eventually reinvented herself and turned her life around—but I’ll come back to that later in this story.

27% savings rate
The View from Taroko GorgeYou might still think of Taiwan as a crowded island of cheap factories off the coast of China, instead of the beautiful, subtropical, high-tech place that it is. You might also imagine that the Taiwanese don’t have much in common with Americans regarding retirement.

But like Ms. Lin, who speaks fluent English and has traveled widely, Taiwanese Boomers often arrive at retirement by paths as steep and circuitous as many American Boomers do. And a look at retirement financing in Taiwan can offer some useful perspective on our own predicament.

A week’s visit obviously wasn’t enough for me to fully understand the retirement situation in Taiwan. But meetings with university professors, local managers from Prudential Financial and Fitch Ratings, and government officials—including pro-business President Ma Ying-jeou—provided a lot of detail.

During a visit to National Chengchi University in the mountains near Taipei, for instance, I heard professor Jennifer L. Wang of the Department of Risk Management and Insurance give a PowerPoint presentation called “Retirement Strategy for an Aging Population.”

As a country, the Taiwanese have good reason to worry about their collective ability to finance retirement. Over the next couple of decades, women’s life expectancy at birth is expected to rise to 85.6 years. The ratio of those over age 65 to those 15 to 64 years old will jump to 34% from 13.5%. At the same time, women are bearing an average of only 1.14 children.

The country’s pension system, like ours, has several moving parts. For government and university employees, a lifetime of low pay is redeemed by a relatively generous pension. Indeed, older Taiwanese public employees still earn a state-guaranteed 18% on their lump-sum payouts, no matter how low the prevailing rates go. Some workers in the private sector and public sector also receive a defined benefit pension through their job.

For other workers, since 1950 there’s been a pay-as-you-go Social Security-type lump-sum pension that replaces as little as 15% of income in retirement, according to one source. To supplement it, the government added a national defined contribution plan in 2005. It’s funded by employer contributions (6% of pay) and employee contributions (up to 6%), but few workers contribute to it. Workers don’t manage their own accounts; the funds are managed—poorly and opaquely, some say—by the government.

In 2008, the government created a National Annuity Pension Plan with an annuity payout option that covers the self-employed and those not enrolled in other public plans. There are also $180-a-month stipends for retired farmers and supplemental $90-a-month checks for certain of the elderly.

The Taiwanese also save a lot in personal accounts. On average, they put aside 27% of their income despite a dearth of tax incentives to do so. Most of the savings goes into bank accounts or in fixed annuities and certificates of deposit. The wealthy traditionally park their savings overseas to elude estate taxes, but a recent inheritance tax cut to 10% from 50% has drawn some of that money back to Taiwan—boosting housing and equity prices.

Prudential sees opportunity
Attracted by Taiwan’s wealth—it has a per capita GDP of $16,500 and $320 billion in U.S. Treasuries in reserve—and relatively open market, many overseas financial firms have set up shop here. Thirty-nine firms have established local entities called Securities Investment Trust Enterprises (SITEs) and offer 509 offshore mutual funds currently worth about NT$1.94 trillion or $58 billion.

One of those SITEs belongs to Prudential Financial, which entered Taiwan by buying Masterlink in October 2000. In a presentation at the Caesar Park Hotel on XhongXiao East Rd., Patricia Tsai, CEO of Prudential Financial’s SITE, explained that her firm manages $3.08 billion here, divided among 26 equity (domestic and international) and fixed income funds.

The retirement market offers at least two opportunities for Prudential and competitors like Polaris and JPMorgan. First, Taiwan’s state pensions are loosening their investment rules. In 2000, they outsourced none of their money to outside managers. But in 2008, desperate for better returns, they outsourced 30% of it. That money is up for grabs.

Second, a 2007 survey by mutual fund providers showed that participants in the state defined contribution plan would like the option to invest in mutual funds rather than keep all of their money in the state-managed fund, which guarantees only a two percent return. Firms like Prudential want to help them manage their own money, 401(k) style.

Pensions as political footballs
Lin Wan-I and Kerry Pechter, RIJ editorBefore that can happen, however, legislative changes will have to occur. Retirement finance here, as everywhere, has complex political ramifications. Promises of higher pension payouts and even outright payments have long played a role in local election campaigns in Taiwan, according to Lin Wan-I, a sociologist at National Taiwan University.

Today, because the government chooses investments for the state pension funds and awards contracts for managing part of the money, fund management is vulnerable to political manipulation, said Mr. Lin, a rice farmer’s son who was a government official in the recent Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration.

(The DPP held Taiwan’s presidency from 2000 to 2008 before losing it to the Kuomintang (KMT). The KMT had ruled the country since 1949, as a dictatorship until 1988 and since then as a democratically-elected government.)

Under the DPP, Lin said, he helped design a national long-term care insurance program and worked to rationalize the country’s fragmented old age pension system. In a conversation with RIJ, he was critical of the KMT, which he said used unrealistic promises of high pension benefits and low pension-related taxes to help win the presidency in 2008.

“Every day, people pay less, but get higher benefits,” Lin said. He also charged that, under President Ma, the government has begun collecting a national long-term care insurance tax but has neglected Lin’s plan to create an infrastructure to deliver nursing home care to Taiwan’s elderly.

And while the state’s defined contribution pension fund lost billions in the 2008 financial crisis, the fund is not run transparently. Reports are issued, but only infrequently, he said.

“We don’t know how the government invests that money. It’s very difficult to understand where the money went. I’m a social insurance expert but I still don’t know much about it.” The state pension is on track to run out of money in 17 years, he said. When asked who would make up the shortfall for Taiwan’s elderly, he smiled, pointed skyward and said, “God.”

Peaks and valleys
The politicians in Taipei have had mixed success coping with the country’s pension problems, but Josephine Lin has made a lot of headway in her personal quest to ensure a secure old age. In the U.S., we hear a lot of talk about how retirees may have to embark on second careers; Ms. Lin has been there and done that.

Not long after moving back to her hometown of Hua Lien in 2005, Ms. Lin was chatting to a friend about what to do next. The friend said, in effect, “You speak English. You love to talk. We live a half-hour from one of the most famous natural wonders in the world. You ought to become a tour guide.”

So she did. She joined the Tourist Guide Association and hired herself out on a contract basis to one of Taiwan’s major tour group management firms. She became a self-taught expert on the volcanic forces that slowly fused and lifted Pacific Ocean sediment into marble mountains 10,000 feet high, and the typhoon-driven rains that, over the millennia, cleft them and created Taroko Gorge.

Almost every day, she and her driver shepherd groups of Western, Mainland Chinese, and Southeast Asian tourists in a VW Caravelle minibus up and down the 19-kilometer canyon, pointing out the shrine to the fallen construction workers, the killer bee nests and the seasonal waterfalls that pour spigot-like from the near-vertical hillsides.

An independent contractor, she earns a decent wage and lots of tips—and perhaps a revenue stream from the owners of the jade shops to which she steers tourists after their trip to the Gorge. She’s still paying down old credit card debt, but after a career with as many peaks and valley as the mountains that surround her, she’s pleased to say that life is good again.

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Should Annuity Firms Care About Social Media?

“Progressive” is not a word typically associated with the annuity industry’s online efforts. The annuity account opening process continues to be arduous and efforts to fully automate and streamline the online process have stalled. Additionally, annuity client and advisor websites lag behind other segments of the financial services industry, such as banking and brokerage, in terms of online account management and client servicing functionalities.

While some of these shortcomings can be attributed to stringent regulatory policies, much of it also has to do with the average age of annuity customers. Annuity contract holders are generally older than most investors, a result of the products’ retirement-focused payout structure. The recommended age to purchase a variable annuity is 55 and recent surveys show the average age of annuity owners is currently 70, up from 66 in 2005.

This brings us to annuity firms’ reluctance to implement social media capabilities on their consumer and advisor websites. A look at the average age of users shows why annuity providers may still be hesitant to get on board: recent surveys conducted by HitWise have found that 59% of the users on social networking sites are between the ages of 18-34 — not exactly the target audience for annuity firms. While the number of users 55 or older has increased by 77% over the last year, this group still accounts for only 5% of the total user base. Moreover, the main draw for many 55+ users surveyed was reconnecting with old friends and staying in touch with family.

Despite the apparent age and lifestyle discrepancies between social media users and annuity investors, a few firms have introduced social media features to clients and prospective investors with varying degrees of success.

Over the last two years, AXA Equitable and TIAA-CREF have both taken a stab at customer-facing social media projects. Among the firms we cover, TIAA-CREF has been the most active and most successful to date. The firm recently launched the final version of myretirement.org, after first making a beta version available to select participants in February 2007.

Myretirement.org offers message boards that allow TIAA-CREF clients to discuss a broad range of financial and lifestyle topics, ranging from investment strategies to travel and leisure. Users create custom profiles with personal images and are able to view other member profiles. Myretirement.org also lets members connect directly via friend requests, a popular feature borrowed from larger social networking sites.

MyRetirement.org Home Page
MyRetirement.org Homepage

AXA Equitable introduced MyRetirementShop.com in July 2008. The sitelet combined investment education content and lifestyle resources (concierge service for purchasing event tickets, golf reservations, etc.) with open forums promoting discussion among community members on a variety of topics.

With nearly 10,000 members and several hundred posts, TIAA-CREF’s myretirement.org seems to have established a solid footing among TIAA-CREF plan participants. Conversely, while AXA’s MyRetirementShop.com remains publicly available, the open forums (the lone social networking aspect of the site) were removed in October 2008 due to a lack of participation.

The relative success of TIAA-CREF’s social network shows that annuity providers can do well in the social media space. But why did TIAA-CREF succeed while AXA languished?

The answer may lie in the phased roll-out and development of the TIAA site, the firm’s philosophy governing the end-user experience, and the unique nature of the firm’s customer base. With Myretirement.org, TIAA-CREF created an open social networking site that fostered a truly collegial atmosphere. By allowing members to communicate directly and building the site around user-driven message board content, TIAA ultimately allows the end-user to determine their experience. AXA’s MyRetirementShop, on the other hand, highlighted content provided largely by the firm, making the open forums feel secondary. The site also imposed significant barriers to entry, including a separate registration process.

TIAA-CREF had another advantage in that the firm’s clients tend to be drawn from certain professional backgrounds, specifically the academic, medical, research and cultural fields, i.e., those that “serve the greater good.” This shared experience provides a strong foundation for an online community.

TIAA-CREF’s decision to initially release a beta version of myretirement.org for select clients also contributed significantly to its success. During the roughly two plus years of the beta release, the firm was able to use feedback to improve site features and work out the kinks, while at the same time seeding the community with active users. Thus, when the final version went live, the site was already chock-full of user-generated content. AXA, on the other hand, launched MyRetirementShop.com without seeding the community, meaning that when users first accessed the site, they found an online ghost town.

Thus far, annuity firms’ general hesitancy to enter the realm of social media has been justified — the current crop of annuity clients has not taken to social networks in any truly meaningful way. But this will not be the case forever. After all, on networks like Facebook, the fastest growing demographic is users 35 years old and older.

Corporate Insight

Sign-up for Corporate Insight‘s free monthly e-newsletters, Industry Insights, and download an excerpt from the report “Social Media: Trends and Tactics in the Financial Services Industry.” All fields are required.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company

© 2009 Corporate Insight, Inc. All rights reserved.


Industry Views are special reports that are sponsored and independent from RIJ’s editorial content.

 

Taiwan Grapples With Retirement Finance

TAIPEI—Jack Wu teaches economics at the National Chengchi University in Taiwan’s capital, and he’s had first-hand experience with the country’s evolving pension system. As a professor at a public university, for instance, the 43-year-old bachelor is covered by the public employees pension system.

The pension isn’t as generous as it used to be—those hired since 1995 don’t earn the guaranteed 18% on savings in retirement that some older civil servants still enjoy—so Wu has mutual funds with AEGON and ING and contributes $450 a month to a university-sponsored deferred income annuity from Taiwan Life.

“The 18% policy was said to have created a great burden on those outside the public sector, who thought it was unfair,” Wu told RIJ over a lunch of spicy chicken and noodles yesterday at the Sheraton Taipei on Zhong Xiao East Rd. 

Wu, who has a Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, is also a first-hand participant in Taiwan’s response to the fact that, like the United States, it will soon have too few workers supporting too many retirees. He’s part of the international Aging Society 2030 project, serving on a team that is helping boost financial literacy in rural parts of this subtropical New Jersey-sized island nation of about 23 million.

“The savings rate is high in Taiwan, but only five or six percent of the population invests in securities,” he said. “The rest put their savings in the bank.  That’s why I and two other colleagues from the Department of Social Work and Insurance are working on a project to educate the elderly people to make investments, prepare for their retirement, and not rely only on the social security system.”

New defined contribution plan

East Asian countries like Japan and Taiwan are faced with a demographic double whammy: their longevity is among the world’s highest and their birth rate is low. In Taiwan, married couples are producing only about 1.1 child each. And even as they lose manufacturing jobs to China, only 120 miles away across the Taiwan Strait, the Taiwanese are trying to establish a stronger social insurance safety net, including national health insurance and pension reforms.

“We had a new labor pension scheme launched in 2005,” Wu said. “In the past, if you worked in the private sector, your employer could deposit some money for your pension, but if you didn’t work there until retirement you lost it. Now we have the new individual account. 

“Your employer deposits six percent, which is mandatory, and you can add another six percent voluntarily. The contributions can only receive about three percent interest, a time deposit, so we haven’t really had self-management. They collect the money, and invest in stocks and bonds, and give you three percent.

“About 30% of the Taiwanese are self-employed and in the past have been outside the official pension system, but we have a new national pension in October 2008 that covers them. They must contribute 675 Taiwanese dollars a month (about $20) and can receive a retirement benefit of about 7,000 Taiwan dollars a month (about $210). That’s only enough for basic needs. For low-income people the government subsidizes 100% of the contributions,” he said.

But not everyone likes the new plan. “Lots of people are refusing to pay into national pension for their children or spouses, because they think the benefit isn’t high enough and because they’re not sure whether the assistance will be there when they retire,” Wu told RIJ. 

“Only about 60% of the people who are supposed to be covered by national pension are paying, and they represent about 20% of the whole population of Taiwan. The system is still trying to work and the government is pushing more people to participate in the pension,” he said.

“Most people in the rural areas don’t even know how to contribute to the national pension, even though the government has sponsored commercials about it. People in the rural areas think they can rely on themselves. We also have the Old Age Farmers Allowance. Farmers can get 6000 Taiwanese dollars a month, and they don’t have to contribute. Elderly people can also get about 3000 Taiwanese dollars a month, or about $180, without contributing anything.”

Reverse mortgages

To help Taiwanese families finance retirement, Wu said, the government has promoted reverse mortgages, financed through banks. But, if successful, such a program could clash with cultural norms. “In traditional Chinese society, the property is important, and parents would leave property to children,” he said. “But if they use the reverse mortgages, there might be issues.”

Rather than being able to look forward to selling their homes and living with their children in retirement, urban Taiwanese today are more likely to have their children and even grandchildren living with them, Wu said. That’s a reflection of declining wages among younger people. “In the cities in the 1980s and 1990s, the younger generation wanted to move out, but more and more people are living with parents again.”

Driving much of the change in Taiwan, as in Japan, is the shrinking number of young people relative to the elderly. Children 14 and younger account for only about one in five Taiwanese. In 2007, there were 7.2 Taiwanese workers for every retiree. By 2026, there will be only 3.2, according to a research paper, “Financial Sustainability of Taiwan’s Social Security System,” Wu published last year.

“It’s rare for a Taiwanese couple to have two children. A lot of Taiwanese women are more educated, and postpone marriage. In the economics department of my university, of the five or six female faculty members, only two are married, and they don’t have children.”

“Less-educated Taiwanese men sometimes have difficulty finding Taiwanese wives and often take brides from Southeast Asia,” he added. “Today, one in six Taiwanese births are now to such brides. Most babies in Taiwan are born to people who are not wealthy. In the rural areas people tend to have more babies. People who live in urban areas often feel that they cannot afford to have children.”

© 2009 RIJ Publishing. All rights reserved.

Gray Zone Strategies

In Chapter 43 of “Unveiling the Retirement Myth,” Otar explains his approach to helping clients in the “Gray Zone,” who don’t have enough assets to self-insure against the major retirement risks, but not so little savings that they must transfer all or most of their risk to insurance companies by buying life annuities. 

Gray Zone Strategies by Jim Otar